HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
RARA UDHYOG – Appellant
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER – Respondent
CW 4398/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.4398/2022
Rara Udhyog, Having Its Address At E-144, RIICO Industrial Area
Phase-Ii, Bagru Ext. Bagru Jaipur 303007, Rajasthan Through Its
Partner Shri Rakesh Rara Son Of Shri Mahaveer Kumar Rara.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 7(2), Jaipur Having Its Address
At Sidhnath Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar Scheme, Behind New
Vidhansabha, Janpath, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302015.
2.
Central Board Of Direct Taxes, Ministry Of Finance, Having
Its Address At North Block, New Delhi-110011 Through
Its Chairman.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Ms. Apeksha Bapna, Advocate for
Mr. Siddharth Ranka, Advocate
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. N.S. Bhatti, Advocate for
Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
22/03/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit
that the issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it
has been put to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the
decision rendered on 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax
Officer, Ward-1(3) & Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022
and batch of petitions) where the notices issued under Section
148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 have been found to be invalid
and impermissible in law and quashed.
(2 of 2)
[CW-4398/2022]
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for
the petitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for
the reasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the
aforesaid cases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is
allowed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Karan/18