HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4303/2022

Rakesh Son Of Babulal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Bahnoli, P.s.

Bonli, Dist. Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan)

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Girish Khandelwal

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Laxman Meena, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA

Order

16/03/2022

This anticipatory bail application has been filed under Section

438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No. 55/2021 registered at Police

Station Bonli, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under

Sections 143, 353, 336 and 379 of IPC, Section 4/21 of MMDR Act

and Section 54/60 of RMMCR.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has no criminal antecedents. The bail application of co-accused

Meghraj under Section 438 of CrPC has already been granted by

this Court vide order dated 03.03.2022. Hence, the anticipatory

bail application of the accused-petitioner may be granted.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed

the bail application.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

material available on record.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-4303/2022]

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for

the petitioner and looking to the facts and circumstances of the

case but without expressing any opinion on the merits and

demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the

petitioner on anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is allowed and

it is ordered that in case of arrest of the petitioner-Rakesh Son Of

Babulal in the aforesaid FIR, the accused-petitioner shall be

released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each

to the satisfaction of concerned SHO/IO on the following

conditions:

i) That the petitioner will make himself available

for the investigation as and when required by the

investigation officer.

ii) That the petitioner will not leave India without

permission of the Court.

iii) That the petitioner will not temper with the

evidence or threaten or pressurize the witnesses

in the case.

(CHANDRA KUMAR SONGARA),J

PAYAL/102