SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
FARJAND ALI
VIKKI SINGH S/O DILIP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/4539/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4539/2022

Vikki Singh S/o Dilip Singh, Aged About 21 Years, Residence Of

Village Rajawa, Ps Birol, District Darbanga, Bihar At Present

Tanent Nathi Bai Ka House, Shiv Colony, Near Meena Petrol

Pump, Near Khatiko Ki Mandhi, Ps Galta Gate, Jaipur ( At Present

Petitioner Is Confiend In Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Dinesh Pareek

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. SK Mahala, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

28/03/2022

1.

The instant bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of accused-petitioner Vikki Singh S/o Dilip Singh.

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.

502/2021 registered at Police Station Shivdaspura, District Jaipur

City South for the offence(s) under Section 392 IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that a

false case has been foisted against the petitioner. The case is

triable by the court of Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is behind

the bars since a long time. The similarly situated co-accused

person has already been granted bail by this Court and the case of

the present petitioner is not distinguishable than that of other co-

accused person.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-4539/2022]

3.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail

application.

4.

Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the

parties and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner

on bail.

5.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above

shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in

the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance

before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and

when called upon to do so.

(FARJAND ALI),J

SAHIL SONI /Gaurav/216

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top