HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5704/2021

Irfan S/o Issar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Gram Padla PS Khoh

Distt. Bharatpur (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg Distt.

Bharatpur)

----Accused/Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Non-Petitioner

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar

through VC

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

19/04/2021

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR

163/2020 registered at Police Station Khoh, District Bharatpur for

the offence(s) under Section(s) 406, 419, 420, 471 & 120-B I.P.C.

and Section 66D of Information Technology (Amendment) Act,

2008 and later on for the offence under Sections 417, 419, 420,

471 & 120-B of I.P.C. and Section 66D of Information Technology

Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that he has

falsely been implicated in this case. He submitted that the

petitioner is in custody since 16.03.2021, similarly situated co-

accused Abbas has been extended benefit of bail and prayed for

his release on bail.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-5704/2021]

Opposing the bail application, learned Public Prosecutor

submitted that there are grave allegation against the petitioner of

cheating the people. He submitted that investigation is still

pending and hence, the petitioner does not deserve indulgence of

bail. With regard to parity with co-accused Abbas, learned Public

Prosecutor submitted that his first bail application was dismissed

at pre-challan stage and he was granted benefit of bail only post

challan and hence, the petitioner cannot be extended benefit of

bail on parity.

Heard the learned counsels for the parties and perused the

record.

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by

learned counsels for the respective parties, in view of gravity of

allegation against the petitioner and especially investigation being

pending; but, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

The bail application is dismissed accordingly.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

PRAGATI/47