SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ANAND SHARMA @ PANDIT @ ASHOK SON OF NARHARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 5909/2021



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5909/2021

1.

Anand Sharma @ Pandit @ Ashok Son Of Narhari, R/o

Bhadroli Police Station Maharajpura District Gawaliyar

M.p. At Present R/o As A Tenent Gautam Ka Makan No.

124 Line Number 02, Near Of Two Number Puliya, Police

Station Hajeera District Gawaliyar M.p. (At Present

Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)

2.

Dinesh Kachoriya Son Of Shri Bhagwan Das @ Bhwan

Das, R/o Gospur No. 1 Harijan Basti, Police Station

Gawaliyar M.p. At Present R/o As A Tenent Gautam Ka

Makan No. 124 Line Number 02, Near Of Two Number

Puliya, Police Station Hajeera District Gawaliyar M.p. (At

Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur)

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Adv.

through V.C.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. M.S. Saini, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

18/05/2021

1.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR

No.252/2020 Registered at Police Station Sadar, District Jaipur

Metropolitan for the offence(s) under Sections 457, 380 of I.P.C.

2.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have

been falsely implicated in this matter. Counsel further submits that

the case is triable by First Class Magistrate and the petitioners are

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-5909/2021]

behind the bars since 02.03.2021 and challan has already been

presented in the court and conclusion of trial may take long time.

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

4.

Considering the material on record and taking into account

the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the

period of custody and without expressing any opinion on the

merits of the case, this petition is allowed. Petitioners be admitted

to regular bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court. Office is

directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court

through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

JYOTI /28

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top