SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
PRAHLAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

JUDGMENT

PRAHLAD VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

S.B.Cr. Revision Petition No. 1118

of 2004 under Section 397 read with

section 401 Cr.P.C. against the

order dated Sept. 15, 2004 of

Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track)

No.2 Sikar in Sessions Case No. 26

of 2004 whereby trial court rejected

the application under section 319

Cr.P.C. for taking cognizance

against Pannalal @ Panna Ram, Kajodi

and Santosh.

Date of Order

: January 9, 2009

PRESENT

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

Mr. Neeraj Chandrana for the petitioner

Mr. Anoop Dhand for the respondents.

Mr.B.N. Sandhu, Public Prosecutor.

BY THE COURT :

This revision petition has been filed

by the petitioner Prahlad, complainant,

against the order dated Sept. 15, 2004 of

Addl. Sessions Judge (Fast Track) No.2 Sikar in

Sessions Case No. 26 of 2004 whereby trial court

rejected the application under section 319

Cr.P.C. for taking cognizance against Pannalal @

Panna Ram, Kajodi and Santosh.

2. Brief facts giving rise to this

revision petition are that on the basis

of the written report dated March 10,

2004 of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top