SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
RAJANTI DEVI W/O HARIKESH MEENA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 6274/2021



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6274/2021

Rajanti Devi W/o Harikesh Meena, Aged About 53 Years, R/o 12

Naai Ka Mohalla Malarna Chaur Ps Malarna Dungar Sawai

Madhopur

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Umesh Dixit, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. S. S. Ola, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

16/08/2021

The present bail application has been filed under Section 438

Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.73/2021 registered at Police

Station Malarna Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for the

offence(s) under Section 379 of IPC and Section 4/21 of Mines and

Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.

On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the

respective parties and the material made available for my perusal

as well as the evidence collected during investigation, which has

been produced before me by way of case diary but without

expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case,

I am inclined to grant benefit of anticipatory bail to the accused-

petitioner.

Consequently, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-6274/2021]

The SHO/IO/Arresting Authority, Police Station Malarna

Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur in FIR No.73/2021 is directed

that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Rajanti Devi W/o

Harikesh Meena, she shall be released on bail, provided she

furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two

sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to his satisfaction on the

following conditions :-

(i)

that the petitioner shall make herself available for

interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly

make any inducement, threat or promise to any person

acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade

him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police

officer, and

(iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without

previous permission of the court.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Jatin /20

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top