HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
RAJKUMAR SHUKLA S/O LATE SHRI SWAYAM PRAKASH SHUKLA – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM LAL SHARMA S/O LATE SHRI SUKHDEV SHARMA – Respondent
CW 5968/2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5968/2021
Rajkumar Shukla S/o Late Shri Swayam Prakash Shukla, R/o Plot
No. 5, Bhairav Nagar, Sodala, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner/Defendant No.1
Versus
1.
Shyam Lal Sharma S/o Late Shri Sukhdev Sharma, Aged
About 65 Years, R/o Plot No. 4-A, Bhairav Nagar, Sodala,
Jaipur (Rajasthan).
Respondent/Plaintiff
2.
Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Through Commissioner, Nagar Nigam
Heritage, Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Lalkothi,
Tonk Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
3.
Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Through Deputy Commissioner, Civil
Lines Zone, Nagar Nigam Heritage, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
----Respondents/Defendants
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sandeep Pathak, through V.C.
Mr. Zakir Hussain, through V.C.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG, through V.C.
Mr. R.K. Daga with Mr. Laxmi Kant
Sharma, through V.C.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
17/01/2022
1.
This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-defendant
No. 1 challenging the ad-interim orders passed by the learned trial
Court as well as lower appellate Court directing the parties to
maintain status quo and not to make any further construction over
the property in dispute.
2.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner-defendant
No. 1 submits that the permissible height as per the Unified by-
laws is 12.5 meters. Counsel further undertakes that the
(2 of 2)
[CW-5968/2021]
petitioner-defendant No. 1 will not construct the building beyond
the permissible height of 12.5 meters.
3.
Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.
2 & 3 submits that the permissible height of the building in
question is upto 12.5 meters. Counsel further submits that liberty
be granted to respondent(s) to take action if there is any violation
of set-backs by the petitioner-defendant No. 1.
4.
In that view of the matter, I dispose of this writ petition with
the following directions;
(i) that the petitioner-defendant No.1 will not raise construction
beyond the permissible height of 12.5 meters.
(ii)
the Nagar Nigam respondent Nos. 2 & 3 are at liberty to take
action against the petitioner-defendant No. 1 in case the
petitioner-defendant No. 1 violates any by-laws with regard to the
set-backs.
5.
This order shall continue till final disposal of the temporary
injunction application by the learned trial Court.
6.
The orders passed by the Courts below stand modified
accordingly.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
CHETNA BEHRANI /171
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.