Advocates:
['YOGESH KUMAR TAILOR', '', 'VIMAL CHAND CHAUDHARY', 'GAURAV CHOUDHARY', 'ANIL MEHTA', '', 'SANJEEV KUMAR SINGHAL']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5124/2021

Heera Nagar Vikas Samiti, Through Its Secretary Shri Sandeep

Manik, R/o Plot No. 183, Heera Nagar, Dcm Godown, Ajmer

Road, Jaipur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government

Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Janpath C-Scheme, Jaipur.

2.

Secretary, Local Self Government, Secretariat, Janpath C-

Scheme, Jaipur.

3.

Director, Local Bodies, Near Civil Lines Railway Phatak, C-

Scheme, Jaipur.

4.

Commissioner Nagar Nigam Greater, Pandit Deendayal

Upadhyay Bhawan, Tonk Road, Jaipur.

5.

Commissioner Nagar Nigam (Heritage), Badi Chopar,

Behind Hawa Mahal, Tripolia Bazaar, Jaipur.

6.

Deputy Commissioner, Jhotwara Zone, Nagar Nigam

Greater, Kalwar Road, Jaipur.

7.

Deputy Commissioner, Nagar Nigam Greater (Vigilance),

Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Bhawan, Tonk Road, Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Vimal Chand Choudhary with

Mr. Yogesh Kumar Tailor

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Singhal

Mr. Yashodhar Pandey for

Mr. Anil Mehta, AAG

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI

Order

01/09/2022

Heard.

(2 of 2)

[CW-5124/2021]

This petition has been filed by the petitioner in public interest

raising an issue with regard to construction allegedly illegal by the

private respondents.

Referring to the reply filed, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent Nos. 4, 5 & 6 would submit that even before filing of

the writ petition, the Corporation had initiated proceedings against

the private respondents on receipt of such complaints and its

premises were sealed. Reply has been obtained from the private

respondents and the matter is pending consideration.

He would submit that the Corporation would be taking

appropriate decision in the matter and after consideration of reply

of the private respondents with regard to the complaints of illegal

construction.

In view of the aforesaid statement and the material available

on record, we are of the view that the purpose of filing of this PIL

has been served. The corporation shall take appropriate decision

in accordance with law.

Giving liberty to all the parties to take such remedy as may

be available to them under the law in the eventuality of filing

order being passed by the Corporation, we are disposed off this

PIL.

(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ

SAHIL SONI /RAJAT/40