SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
M/S RIDHI SIDHI ASSOCIATES – Appellant
Versus
STATE MINES DEPARTMENTORS – Respondent


1

1. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8797/2016

2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8859/2016

3. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8862/2016

4. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8993/2016

5. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9033/2016

Date: July 18, 2016.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA

Mr. R.P. Singh, Senior Advocate with

Mr. S.K. Saini, for the petitioner.

Mr. N.K. Maloo, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Ajeet Maloo, ] for petitioners.

Mr. Vikas Balia with ]

Mr. Akash Srivastava ]

Mr. Shivangshu Naval]

Mr. Achintya Kaushik]

Mr. Dinesh Yadav ]

Mr. Anurag Sharma, AAG for the State.

BY THE COURT:

Counsel for the petitioners submit that in identical matters at

Principal seat of this court at Jodhpur i.e. SBCWP No.7434/2016 and

matters connected therewith, show cause notices demanding payment of

monthly contractual amount with reference to excess royalty collection

contracts under pain of cancellation have been stayed for reason of

supervening illegality in the mining operation wherefrom excess royalty

had to be collected. It was submitted that the cases at hand are not one of

contract between principals. The petitioners as the contractors for the

State for collecting excess roya

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top