SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
FARJAND ALI
DURGALAL S/O MOHANLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/5894/2022



HIOH COURT OF JUDICATURE

FOR RAJASTHAPI

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.8. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 589412022

Durgalal S/O Mohanlal, Aged bout 32 Years, R/o Village Nadit

P.s. Sawar, Distt. Ajmer At Present I n Central Jail Ajmer.

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pep.

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5922/2022

1.

Shahrukh Khan Son Of Badrudeen, Aged About 24 Years,

Resident Of Nada, Sawar, Police Station Sawar, District

Ajmer Presently Confined I n Central Jail Ajmer (Raj.)

2.

Mahboob Khan Son Of Badrudeen, Aged About 23 Years,

Resident Of Nada, Sawar, Police Station Sawar, District

Ajmer Presently Confined I n Central Jail Ajmer (Raj.)

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. A.K. Maheshwari.

Mr. Manish Sharma.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. M S . Saini, PP.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

I.

The

petitioners

Badrudeen

439 Cr.P.C.

nstant bail applications have been filed

~

~

~

~

a

l

a

i

s/o Mohanlal and Shahrukh Khan

and Mahboob Khan son Of Badrudeen under

The petitioners have been arrested in connecti

by the

Son Of

Section

on with

FIR N0864/2022 registered at Police Station Sawar, Ajmer for the

offence(s) under Sections 8/18 of NDPS ~ c t .

2*

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that false cases

have been foisted against the petitioners. They have nothing to do

with the alleged offence and no useful purpose would be served by

keeping them behind the bars. He further submits that the

recovered contraband article is much below the c~mnercial

quantity.

3.

Per contra,

learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail

applications.

4.

Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the

parties and looking to the possibility that the trial may take long

time to conclude, thi,s court deems it just and proper to enlarge

the petitioners on bail.

5.

Accordingly, the bail applications under Section 439 Cr. P.C.

are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners shall be

enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.S0,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance

before the court concerned on. all the dates of hearing as and

when called upon to do so.

(FARJAND ALI),J

PREETI VALECHA /216-217

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top