HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 421/2020

1.

Parmal Singh S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 55 Years,

R/o Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

2.

Jagdish S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o

Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

3.

Virendra S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o

Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

4.

Yadu Raj S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o

Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Badan Singh S/o Shri Ajee Ram, Aged About 46 Years,

R/o Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

----Respondents

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 412/2020

1.

Parmal Singh S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 55 Years,

R/o Village Babri, Teh, Bayana, Bharatpur, Raj.

2.

Jagdish S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o

Village Babri, Teh, Bayana, Bharatpur, Raj.

3.

Virendra S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o

Village Babri, Teh, Bayana, Bharatpur, Raj.

4.

Yadu Raj S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o

Village Babri, Teh, Bayana, Bharatpur, Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Inder S/o Shri Dhansi, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village

Babri, Teh, Bayana, Bharatpur, Raj.

----Respondents

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 422/2020

1.

Parmal Singh S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 55 Years,

R/o Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

(2 of 2)

[CRLW-421/2020]

2.

Jagdish S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 51 Years, R/o

Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

3.

Virendra S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 43 Years, R/o

Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

4.

Yadu Raj S/o Shri Shree Ram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o

Vill. Babri Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur Raj.

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2.

Hukam Singh S/o Shri Shiv Charan, Aged About 40 Years,

R/o Vill. Babri Ps Rudawal Tehsil Bayana Dist. Bharatpur

Raj.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Dr. Sohan Lal Sharma

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahla, PP

For complainant

:

None

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

18/08/2022

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after

investigation, Investigating Officer had filed negative final report

and trial court had ordered for re-investigation.

The petitioners would be at liberty to challege any adverse

order passed against them at appropriate stage.

Petitions stand disposed of accordingly. All pending

applications also stand disposed of.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Brijesh 70-72.