HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
NARENDRA SINGH KHICHI SON OF LATE SHRI RAM SINGH KHICHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
WMAP 139/2019
['RAJAT RANJAN', 'ANIL MEHTA AAG', '', 'M L SHARMA', 'AMIT KURI', 'DEVENDRA SINGH RAGHAVA', 'INTJAR ALI', 'NAINA SARAF']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Writ Miscellaneous Application No. 139/2019
Narendra Singh Khichi Son Of Late Shri Ram Singh Khichi,
Resident Of Plot No. 14, Ganesh Colony, Near Imliwala Phatak,
Jaipur (Raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Urban
Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Nigam Tonk Road,
Jaipur.
3.
The Commissioner, Jaipur Nagar Nigam Tonk Road, Jaipur.
4.
The Commissioner, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur.
5.
Shri Vijay Kumar Sharma @ Mamaji Builder, R/o 129-130,
Janakpuri, Near Imliwala Phatak, Jaipur.
6.
Senior Divisional Engineer, H.Q. North Western Railway,
Zone Jaipur.
7.
Smt. Deepa Vijay Wife Of Ashok Vijay,
8.
Shri Ashok Vijay Son Of Shri Prayagraj Vijay,
Both resident Of Plot No. 9, Ganesh Colony, Near Imliwala
Phatak, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. M.M. Ranjan, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Daulat Sharma, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Anil Mehta, Additional Advocate
General with Mr. Yashodhar Pandey,
Adv.,
Mr. Amit Kuri, Adv. with Mr. Vikram
Sharma, Adv. & Ms. Aditi Jodha, Adv.,
Dharma Ram, Adv. for JDA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Order
23/03/2022
(2 of 7)
[WMAP-139/2019]
Matter comes up for considering the application filed by the 5
applicants for recalling the order dated 19.05.2017 passed by this
Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8106/2009 along with S.B. Civil
Writ Petition No.14948/2009, decided by the common order.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that the
applicants are residents of Ganesh Colony, Arjun Nagar, Mahesh
Colony, Natraj Nagar, Telephone Colony, Barkat Nagar, Radha
Krishan Nagar, Arujunpuri and other nearby colonies and they are
near the Railway Line leading from 22 Godown (Ganda Nala to
Tonk Phatak) Jaipur.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that the
applicants are plot holders and they have constructed their
houses.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that the
JDA has also allotted plots to certain applicants and as such they
are in legal possession and have title over the plots.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8106/2009 was filed before this Court
by the petitioner Narendra Singh Khinchi whereby he had prayed
for issuing direction to the official respondents to remove illegal
construction and structure said to be made by the private
respondent No.5 in the writ petition-Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that the
petitioner had raised grievance in respect of only one person and
strict legal action was sought against the said private respondent
in the writ petition.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that this
Court while passing the order dated 19.05.2017, has given
(3 of 7)
[WMAP-139/2019]
direction to remove encroachment said to be existing between the
Railway Track and Mahesh Colony.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that the
respondent-Jaipur Development Authority (hereinafter referred to
as ‘the JDA’) was given opportunity to give notice under Sections
32 & 72 of the Jaipur Development Authority Act, 1982
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 1982’) and compliance of the
order passed in the case of Gulab Kothari & Ors. Versus State
of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition [PIL]
No.1554/2004), was also required to be ensured.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that
while passing the order, this Court gave direction to remove all
encroachments against all the similarly placed persons without
discrimination and further found that no opportunity was required
to be given to such encroachers except by issuing notice under
Sections 32 & 72 of the Act of 1982.
Learned Senior Counsel for the applicants submitted that the
applicants who are ha