HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
RANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRLA 1210/2009
1.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
JUDGMENT
1. Vishnu Soni v. State of Rajasthan
[D.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal No.562/2009]
2. Rani v. State of Rajasthan
[D.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal No.1210/2009]
D.B. Criminal Appeals against the
Judgment dated 19.3.2009 passed by
the Court of Additional Sessions
Judge (Fast Track), Hindaun City
(Karauli) in Sessions Case No.20/08
(3/08).
Date of Judgment: 07/08/2015
PRESENT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA
Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, Amicus Curiae, for accused-
appellants.
Mrs. Sonia Shandilya, Public Prosecutor for State.
(Per Ahluwalia, J.) (Oral)
Vishnu Soni and Rani both have preferred appeals
through Jail to assail the impugned judgment dated
19.3.2009 rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge
(Fast Track), Hindaun City (Karauli). Both the
appellants Vishnu Soni and Rani are husband and
wife. Vishnu Kumar has instituted D.B. Criminal
(Jail) Appeal No.562/2009 and Rani has preferred
D.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal No.1210/2009. Since in
both the appeals common impugned judgment has been
assailed, we shall decide both the appeals together.
Case of the prosecution is that both the
appellants alongwith the deceased Kistoori Devi wife
of Mulya Jogi, aged 60 years on 1.11.2007 had taken
a room in a Dharamshala called Patthar Walo Ki
Dharamshala, Nai Mandi, Hindaun City. On 3.11.2007
Ramdas (P.W.1), Manager of Dharamshala found Room
No.2 taken by both the appellants and the deceased
2.
Kistoori Devi bolted from outside. When nobody
returned in the evening at about 6.30 P.M., police
was called and room was opened. Inside the room,
dead body of Kistoori Devi was found and silver
anklets worn by her were found missing. Thus, the
prosecution to secure conviction of the appellants
relied upon evidence of, (i) last seen which has
surfaced in the testimony of Ramdas (P.W.1); and
(ii) recovery of anklets of the deceased from
accused to complete chain of circumstances to arrive
at the conclusion that the appellants alone had
committed the offence.
Taking
above
two
circumstances
into
consideration, the Court of Additional Sessions
Judge (Fast Track), Hindaun City vide impugned
judgment dated 19.3.2009 held the appellants guilty
of offences under Sections 302/34, 397/34, 364/34
IPC. Having convicted the appellants for above said
offences, the trial Judge vide a separate order of
even date, sentenced them as under:-
“U/s. 302/34 IPC: Life imprisonment, to
pay a fine of Rs.1000/- and in default
thereof to undergo three months simple
imprisonment.
U/s. 397/34 IPC: Seven years rigorous
imprisonment, to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-
and in default thereof to undergo three
months simple imprisonment.
U/s. 364/34 IPC: Seven years rigorous
imprisonment, to pay a fine of Rs.1000/-
and in default thereof to undergo three
months simple imprisonment.”
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Sharma (P.W.9) on 5.11.2007
at 3.50 P.M. conducted autopsy on the dead body of
Kistoori deceased. Dr. Rajendra Kumar Sharma (P.W.9)
was a member of the Medical Board alongwith Dr. B.K.
3.
Sharma and Dr. T.R. Gupta. According to the opinion
of the Medical Board, cause of death was asphyxia
due to throttling.
Prosecution in all examined eleven witnesses and
proved on record documents Exhibit P.1 to P.32.
Thereafter statement of accused was recorded under
Section 313 Cr.P.C. Accused in defence only relied
upon Photograph (Ex.D.1).
Ramdas (P.W.1) is a star witness of the
prosecution. He has witnessed the evidence of last
seen and identification of the accused-appellants in
the court for the first time. Ramdas (P.W.1) deposed
that for last five years he was Manager of Patthar
Walo Ki Dharamshala. On 1.11.2007 at about 1.30 P.M.
Vishu Chand Soni alongwith his wife and an old la