HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7539/2022

Abdul Wajid S/o Salijm Ahmed, R/o Pilkahana Police Station

Kotwali Jhalawar District Kota

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Aman Ali

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

06/07/2022

1.

Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.280/2022

registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar for

the offence(s) under Sections 13 of RPGO, 66C Information

Technology Act and under Section 420 of I.P.C., the petitioner has

preferred this anticipatory bail application under Section 438

Cr.P.C.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the case

came to be instituted upon a complaint made by the SHO. It is not

a case where custodial interrogation would be required. No offence

under Section 420 is made out. He is ready to cooperate with the

investigation.

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail

application.

4.

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

petitioner and taking into account the totality of facts and

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-7539/2022]

circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on

the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to allow

the anticipatory bail application.

5.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The

S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar,

District Jhalawar in F.I.R. No.280/2022 is directed that in the

event of arrest of the petitioner-Abdul Wajid S/o Salijm Ahmed

he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting

Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following

conditions:-

(i)

that the petitioner shall make himself

available for interrogation by a police officer as and

when required;

(ii)

that the petitioner shall not directly or

indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise

to any person acquainted with the facts of the case

so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to

the court or any police officer, and

(iii)

that the petitioner shall not leave India

without previous permission of the court.

(FARJAND ALI),J

RAJAT KUMAR /157