HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
JETHU SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJ AND ANR – Respondent
CRLMP 65/2018
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT
JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 65 / 2018
Jethu Singh S/o Shri Amar Singh B/c Rajput, R/o Molasar, Police
Station Molasar, Distt. Nagur, Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
2. Department of Mines and Geology, Raj. Ajmer Through Mining
Engineer, Ajmer.
----Respondents
_____________________________________________________
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aladeen Khan, PP
_____________________________________________________
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI
Judgment / Order
22/01/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public
Prosecutor.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that in
FIR No.169/2017 registered at PS Rupangarh, Ajmer for the
offence under Sections 379 IPC and 4/21 of the Mines & Mineral
(Development & Regulations) Act,1957 (‘MMDR Act’), the matter
has been compounded in regard to the vehicle seized and a
compounding fees of Rs.1,08,750/- has been deposited on
20.11.2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite this,
learned court below has rejected the application for releasing the
Vehicle (Dumper) No.RJ-37-GA-4449 in favour of the accused-
petitioner.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-65/2018]
On perusal of the order dated 11.12.2017, it is found that
the court below has inferred that simply by depositing the
compound fees, it cannot be presumed that the offence under
Section 4/21 of the MMDR Act has been compounded. This
inference drawn by the court is completely fallacious and cannot
be sustained. As per sub-section (2) of Section 23-A of the MMDR
Act, no further proceeding shall be taken against the offender
after compounding of offence.
In view of this, the seized vehicle ought to have been
released by the court below.
In view of above, the misc. petition is allowed. The order
dated 19.12.2017 passed by learned Addl. District Judge,
Kishangarh, Ajmer is quashed and set-aside. It is directed that
Dumper bearing Registration No.RJ-37-GA-4449 shall be delivered
to the petitioner on ‘supurdgi’ on his furnishing ‘Supurdginama’ in
the sum of Rs.5,00,000/- with two sureties in the like amount,
with the undertaking to produce the vehicle in question before the
concerned court as and when required and shall keep the
condition of the vehicle intact and shall not transfer, mortgage or
otherwise alienate the vehicle or damage it and change its shape
in any manner whatsoever. The petitioner shall also furnish
photographs of the vehicle showing its number, colour etc. It is
made clear that in future if the vehicle is found to have been used
in similar offence, the same would be liable to be confiscated.
(DEEPAK MAHESHWARI) J.
Rm/73
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.