SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
HARDEENA RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJ AND ANR – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT

JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Misccellaneous (Petition) No. 68 / 2018

Hardeena Ram S/o Bhawara Ram, by caste Jat, R/o Neemod,

Tehsil Deedwana, District Nagur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Raj through PP

2.

Department of Mines and Geology, Rajasthan, Ajmer through

Mining Engineer, Ajmer.

----Respondent

_____________________________________________________

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aladeen Khan, PP

_____________________________________________________

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MAHESHWARI

Order

24/01/2018

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor.

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that in

FIR No.171/2017 registered at PS Rupangarh, Ajmer for the

offence under Section 379 IPC & under Section 4/21 of the Mines

& Mineral (Development & Regulations) Act,1957 (‘MMDR Act’),

the matter has been compounded in regard to the vehicle seized

and a compounding fees of Rs.1,08,750/- has been deposited on

20.11.2017.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite this,

learned court below has rejected the application for rele

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top