SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
RAHUL @ GUTYA S/O SHRI RAMSWAROOP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 7979/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7979/2022

1.

Rahul @ Gutya S/o Shri Ramswaroop, Aged About 20

Years, R/o Village Hagotiya P.s Niwai Distt Tonk At Presen

Tenent At Kachhi Basti, Paanch Kooa, Niwai P.s. Niwai,

District Tonk, At Present At Rajputo Ka Makan, J.d.a

Colony, Baksawala, P.s Sanganer Sadar, Distt Jaipur

(South) ( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

2.

Narayan S/o Shri Chandaram, Aged About 50 Years, R/o

Village Hagotiya P.s Niwai Distt Tonk At Presen Tenent At

Kachhi Basti, Paanch Kooa, Niwai P.s. Niwai, District Tonk

( At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur)

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mahala, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

26/05/2022

1.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR

No.155/2022 Registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur

City (South) for the offence(s) under Sections 379 and 411 IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. They are

behind the bars since 15.05.2022. Offence against the petitioners

is triable by Magistrate and conclusion of trial may take long time.

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-7979/2022]

4.

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners

on bail.

5.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Rahul @

Gutya S/o Shri Ramswaroop and Narayan S/o Shri

Chandaram shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them

furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two

sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial

Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the

dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Jatin /69

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top