SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
RAMRAJ GORA S/O SHRI POORAN GURJAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 3771/2021



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3771/2021

Ramraj Gora S/o Shri Pooran Gurjar, R/o Bhopar Sahpur,

Tehsil Mahuwa, District Dausa.

----Accused-Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

2.

Ajit Singh Jatav Hc 121 Ps Mahuwa, R/o Mahatoli

Bhusawar, Dustrict Bharatpur At Present Hc 121 Ps

Mahuwa, District Dausa.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Kumud Singh, through VC

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Atul Sharma, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SATISH KUMAR SHARMA

Order

03/08/2021

;kph&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk ds

vUrxZr ;g ;kfpdk iqfyl Fkkuk] egqvk ftyk nkSlk esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ

la[;k&356@2021 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 19@54 jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e dh

dk;Zokgh dks lekIr djus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk is'k dh xbZ gSA

geus nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl lquh ,oa i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k

x;kA

fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&vfHk;qDr dh nyhysa gSa fd ;kph&vfHk;qDr

funksZ’k gSA ftl txg tCrh djuk crk;k x;k gS] mlls mldk dksbZ laca/k ugha

gSA ;kph&vfHk;qDr dks flQZ jktuhfrd jaft”ko”k Qalk;k x;k gSA og

vuqla/kku esa Hkkx ysus ds fy;s rRij gS] vr% iz”uxr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh

dk;Zokgh lekIr fd;s tkus ;ksX; gSA

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-3771/2021]

vkns”k fnukad 08-07-2021 dh ikyuk esa ifjoknh gSM dkaLVscy

vthrflag U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gS] ftlds }kjk is”k dh xbZ vuqla/kku izxfr

fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds f[kykQ /kkjk 19@54 jktLFkku vkcdkjh

vf/kfu;e dk vijk/k izekf.kr gS vkSj mlds f[kykQ vkB vU; vkijkf/kd izdj.k

fopkjk/khu gSaA

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k fd;k gSA

ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk M/s. Neeharika Infrastructure

Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2021 SCC Online SC 315 ,oa State of

Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal : {1992 (supp)1 SCC 335} esa izfrikfnr fof/kd

fLFkfr ds vuqlkj fdlh Hkh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh dk;Zokgh rHkh lekIr dh tk

ldrh gS] tc izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa vafdr rF;ksa ds vk/kkj ij dksbZ vijk/k cuuk

ugha ik;k tkrk gks] ysfdu bl ekeys esa ntZ dh xbZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa /kkjk

19@54 jktLFkku vkcdkjh vf/kfu;e ds lHkh vko”;d rRo ekStwn gSaA

vuqla/kku ds mijkUr ;kph&vfHk;qDr ds f[kykQ mDr vijk/k izekf.kr ik;k x;k

gSA izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa Hkh mldk uke vafdr gSA bu gkykr esa

;kph&vfHk;qDr ds f[kykQ ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ dh dk;Zokgh lekIr fd;s tkus

;ksX; ugha gSA ifj.kker% izLrqr ;kfpdk ,rn~}kjk [kkfjt dh tkrh gSA

(SATISH KUMAR SHARMA),J

Pradeep Thawani /130

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top