SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
ATUL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH P P – Respondent


Advocates:
['NEMI CHAND CHOUDHARY', 'P P', '', 'NITIN JAIN']

1

In the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur

Bench, Jaipur

O R D E R

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.12989/2012.

Atul Kumar

VERSUS

State of Rajasthan

Date Of Order :::

28/02/2013.

Hon'ble Mr. Justice R.S. Chauhan

Mr. Nemi Chand Choudhary, Counsel for the Petitioner

Mr. Nitin Jain, Counsel for the complainant

Mr. Peeyush Kumar, Public Prosecutor for the State

***

Per Court :

Heard Mr. Nemi Chand Choudhary, the learned

counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Nitin Jain, the learned counsel

for the complainant, and Mr. Peeyush Kumar, the learned

Public Prosecutor for the State.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has

contended that although no transaction had taken place

between the petitioner and the complainant, still on

14.11.2011, the complainant filed a F.I.R., wherein he

claimed that the petitioner had bought gold jewelry worth

Rs.48,36,228/- from him. He further claimed that a cheque

for the amount of Rs.47,80,000/- was given to him. Despite

the fact that he has been asking the petitioner to pay the

money, the petitioner had on 06.05.2011, requested his

Bank to stop the payment of the cheque. Hence, despit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top