SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
M/S B9 BEVERAGES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 8590/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8590/2022

M/s B9 Beverages Private Limited, Premise No. 106, Second

Floor Block H, Connaught Circus New Delhi Dl 110001, Through

Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Naresh S/o Sh. Ramchander, R/o

Garanpura Kalan, Garanpura (86), Bhiwani, Haryana-127040.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Superintendent Of Police,

Dist. Alwar, Rajasthan.

2.

Town Inspector (Sho), Rajgarh, Dist. Alwar, Rajasthan.

3.

District Excise Officer, Alwar, Rajasthan, Hasan Khan

Mewati Nagar, Alwar, Rajasthan 301001.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Rohit Tiwari, Mr. V.N. Dubey and

Mr. Ibrahim Kannodwal

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

01/07/2022

The instant writ petition has been filed seeking a direction for

respondent No.3 to decide the pending application filed by the

petitioner under Section 69 (2-B) of the Rajasthan Excise Act,

1950 (for brevity “the Act of 1950”) for release of the seized

article (Beer) having limited shelf life.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his

application for release of seized article (Beer) is pending

consideration before the respondent No.3 since 10th May 2022 and

its shelf life is expiring in the 2nd week of August, 2022. He,

therefore, prays that respondent No. 3 may be directed to decide

(2 of 2)

[CW-8590/2022]

its application expeditiously and the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 may

be directed to co-operate the respondent No. 3 in doing so.

In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel

petitioner, this writ petition is being disposed of without issuing

notice to the respondents.

Respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the application filed

by the petitioner under Section 69 (2-B) of the Act of 1950 within

a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this

order. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to co-operate the

respondent No. 3 to comply the order passed by this Court.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

Ashu/54

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top