HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
AMIT TIWARI S/O SHRI BHAWANI SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
SHRI RAJHANS UPADHYAY, CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGIND DIRECTOR – Respondent
CCP 909/2019
['G L SHARMA', '', 'JITENDRA KUMAR MEENA', 'VINAYAK JOSHI']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 909/2019
Amit Tiwari S/o Shri Bhawani Shankar, Aged About 40 Years,
Resident Of B-394, 395, Vidhadhar Nagar, Jaipur District Jaipur
(Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Rajhans Upadhyay, Chairman Cum Managind
Director, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation,
Parivahan Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2.
Shri Umardeen Khan, Executive Director (Traffic),
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Jaipur
(Rajasthan)
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 932/2019
Sait Cristy S/o Shri David, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of
124, Dadu Nagar, Bichun Road, Phulera, Jaipur, District Jaipur
(Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Shri Rajhans Upadhyay, Chairman Cum Managing
Director, Rajasthan State Road, Transport Corporation,
Parivahan Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2.
Shri Umardeen Khan, Excutive Director (Traffic),
Rajasthan State Road, Transport Corporation, Jaipur
(Rajasthan).
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 933/2019
1.
Jay Kumar Joshi S/o Shri Vijay Kumar Joshi, Aged About
37 Years, Resident Of Sikandra, Teh. Sikray, District
Dausa (Rajasthan)
2.
Khangendra Singh Naruka S/o Shri Dungar Singh,
Resident Of Bagar Ka Bans (Nai Basti), Thakur Ka Kua
Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan)
3.
Anil Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Guljari Lal Sharma, Resident
Of Badh, Post Dhigawada, Teh. Rajgarh, District Alwar
(2 of 3)
[CCP-909/2019]
(Rajasthan)
4.
Harveer Singh S/o Shri Yadra Yadav, Resident Of Nagla
Dharsoni, Teh. Vair, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Shri Rajhans Upadhyay, Chairman Cum Managing
Director, Rajasthan State Road, Transport Corporation,
Parivahan Bhawan, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
2.
Smt. Suchi Sharma Managing Director, Rajasthan State
Road, Transport Corporation, Parivahan Bhawan, Jaipur
(Rajasthan).
3.
Shri Umardeen Khan, Executive Director (Traffic)
Rajasthan State Road, Transport Corporation, Jaipur
(Rajasthan).
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. GL Sharma
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Vinayak Joshi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment / Order
22/07/2020
Learned counsel states that an appeal has been preferred
against the order passed in the main case namely, Avinash
Sharma Vs. State, SBCWP No.15286/2017 by Kishan Lal Bairwa
and others, namely D.B. Special Appeal No.1703/2019. The
Division Bench has stayed the operation of the order passed by
the Single Bench.
Learned counsel submits that the present contempt petitions
arise out of the order passed by the Coordinate Bench in SBCWP
No.21164/2017 and connected writ petitions, decided on 4.4.2019
wherein the Coordinate Bench has relied and applied the judgment
passed in the case of Avinash Sharma which has been stayed by
(3 of 3)
[CCP-909/2019]
the Division Bench. In view thereof, the order passed by the
Coordinate Bench on 4.4.2019 cannot be implemented.
It is also informed that D.B. Special Appeals have been
preferred by the RSRTC against the present order also which have
been tagged along with D.B. Special Appeal No.1703/2019 and the
present petitioners are party to the said D.B. Special Appeal.
Keeping in view above facts which are borne out from the
record, this Court closes the present contempt proceedings.
Petitioners’ claim shall be abided by the order passed by the
Division Bench. Accordingly, these contempt petitions are
dismissed. Notices are discharged.
A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
FATEH RAJ BOHRA/6-74 to 76