HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
VINOD KUMAR GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR – Respondent
CRLMP 1260/2016
['SUDHIR JAIN', 'P P', '', 'K N SHARMA']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1260/2016
Vinod Kumar Gupta S/o Late Shri Prabhti Lal Gupta, R/o 73A,
Geejgarh Vihar, Hawa Sadak, Bais Godown, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp
2.
Anil Agarwal S/o Shri Shyam Bihari, Director Shyam
Apparels Pvt. Ltd. H-31, Taigore Path, Bani Park
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Sudhir Jain, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
Mr. K. N. Sharma, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
Order
02/05/2022
This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed by the
petitioners under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR
No.390/2015 registered at Police Station Vidhyakpuri,
Jaipur(South) for the offence under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B
IPC qua the petitioner and proceedings pursuant thereto.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that compromise
has been arrived between the parties and they have settled their
dispute. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that
trial court had attested compromise under Sections 420 and 406
IPC. Offence under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 474 IPC are not
compoundable. So, criminal proceedings pending between them,
be set aside.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-1260/2016]
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the arguments
advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the complainant acknowledging the
factum of compromise between the parties and submitted that he
has no objection if the FIR in question and consequential criminal
proceeding are quashed.
Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the
record.
A perusal of the material on record shows that the dispute
between the parties has amicably been settled by them. In view of
compromise and the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court of
India in cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10
SCC 303, Narinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2014) 6 SCC
466 and Manoj Agarwal & Anr. Vs. The State of Uttar
Pradesh & Anr. decided on 04.03.2022 by the Hon’ble Supreme
Court, this Court deems it just and proper to quash the FIR in
question and consequential criminal proceedings.
Resultantly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed.
The FIR No.390/2015 registered at Police Station Vidhyakpuri,
Jaipur(South) for the offence under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B
IPC qua the petitioner and proceedings pursuant thereto are
hereby quashed and set aside qua the petitioner.
Stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J
Gourav/101