SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
SUNIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH P P – Respondent


1

S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION

PETITION NO. 95/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR

ORDER

S.B. CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 95/2013

SUNIL KUMAR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN.

DATE OF ORDER : 05.04.2013

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-II

Mr. Azad Ahmed, for the accused-petitioner.

Mr. Laxman Meena, Public Prosecutor, for the respondent-

State.

BY THE COURT:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner(a

juvenile- through his guardian mother) as well as learned

Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

2.

This revision petition under Section 53 of the

Juvenile Justice(Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000

(hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 2000') has been filed

against the judgment dated 30.01.2013 passed by learned

Special Judge, Dacoiti Effected Area, Bharatpur(hereinafter

referred to as 'the Appellate Court') in Criminal Appeal No.

9/2013, whereby the Appellate Court dismissed the appeal of

the petitioner and upheld the order dated 07.01.2013 passed

by the Principal Magistrate, Juvenile Justice Board, Bharatpur

in FIR No. 425/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top