HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15477/2021

1.

Ratipal Singh S/o Mangej Singh, Aged About 50 Years,

R/o Village Dabla, Tehsil-Neem Ka Thana, District-Sikar

(Raj.)

2.

Shrimati Prem Kanwar W/o Ratipal Singh, Aged About 50

Years, R/o Village Dabla, Tehsil-Neem Ka Thana, District-

Sikar (Raj.)

3.

Sunil Singh S/o Ratipal Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o

Village Dabla, Tehsil -Neem Ka Thana, District-Sikar

(Raj.), Current Address Sector 22 Gurgaon (Haryana)

4.

Renu Kanwar D/o Mangej Singh W/o Surendra Singh,

Aged About 29 Years, R/o Rampura Thoi, Tehsil-

Srimadhopur District-Sikar (Raj.)

----Petitioners

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16487/2021

Jitu Singh S/o Ratipal Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vill.

Dabla Tehsil Neem Ka Thana Dist. Sikar Raj.

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. R. S. Rajawat, Adv. Mr. Pratush

Choudhary, Adv. on behalf of

Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

For Complainant(s)

:

:

Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP

Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Adv.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

02/12/2021

(2 of 3)

[CRLMB-15477/2021]

1.

The present bail applications have been filed under Section

438 Cr.P.C. in connection with FIR No.32/2018 registered at Police

Station Mahila Thana, Jhunjhunu for the offence(s) under Sections

498-A and 406 IPC.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned

counsel for the petitioners also submits that petitioners have

joined the investigation as per direction of this Court. Learned

counsel for the petitioners also submits that petitioner-Jitu Singh

has filed a petition under Section 12(1)(a) of Hindu Marriage Act.

After that, the present FIR was lodged by the complainant.

Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that they have

given the dowry articles to the Investigating Officer. Nothing is to

be recovered from the petitioners.

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the

complainant have opposed the bail applications.

4.

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, this court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory

bail application.

5.

Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications are allowed.

The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Mahila Thana,

Jhunjhunu in F.I.R. No.32/2018 is directed that in the event of

arrest of the petitioners-Ratipal Singh S/o Mangej Singh,

Shrimati Prem Kanwar W/o Ratipal Singh, Sunil Singh S/o

Ratipal Singh, Renu Kanwar D/o Mangej Singh W/o

(3 of 3)

[CRLMB-15477/2021]

Surendra Singh and Jitu Singh S/o Ratipal Singh, they shall

be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of

Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting

Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following

conditions:-

(i)

that the petitioners shall make themselves available for

interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii)

that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any

inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the

facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts

to the court or any police officer, and

(iii)

that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous

permission of the court.

6.

All the pending applications also stand disposed of.

7.

A copy of this order be placed in each connected file.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Jatin /148-149