SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
SOHAN LAL PALIWAL S/O SHRI ONKARLAL PALIWAL – Appellant
Versus
SMT. GOPALI W/O LATE SHRI BANARSIDASJI – Respondent
CW/13119/2022



[2023/RJJP/001138]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13119/2022

Sohan Lal Paliwal S/o Shri Onkarlal Paliwal, Aged About 72

Years, R/o Plot Number-1627, Bhatton Ki Gali, Chokdi

Ramchandraji, Jaipur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Smt. Gopali W/o Late Shri Banarsidasji, R/o Shopkeeper

Harish Flower Decorate-27 Badi Chopad Phoolwalo Ka

Khanda Jaipur, Presently Resides At 113, In Front Of Shiv

Mandir, Maharana Pratap Marg, Ridhi Nagar, Vaishali

Bypass Jaipur.

2.

Khem Chand S/o Late Shri Banarsidasji, R/o Shopkeeper

Harish Flower Decorate-27 Badi Chopad Phoolwalo Ka

Khanda Jaipur, Presently Resides At 113, In Front Of Shiv

Mandir, Maharana Pratap Marg, Ridhi Nagar, Vaishali

Bypass Jaipur.

3.

Harsish Chandra S/o Late Shri Banarsidasji, R/o

Shopkeeper Harish Flower Decorate-27 Badi Chopad

Phoolwalo Ka Khanda Jaipur, Presently Resides At 113, In

Front Of Shiv Mandir, Maharana Pratap Marg, Ridhi Nagar,

Vaishali Bypass Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv

For Respondent(s)

:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

01/02/2023

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner(s)

with the prayer to direct the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur No-2

Metropolitan-I to decide the Rent Appeal No.481/2013

expeditiously.

[2023/RJJP/001138]

(2 of 2)

[CW-13119/2022]

Counsel for the petitioner(s) submitted that the appeal is

pending before the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur No-2 Metropolitan-I since

2013 and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously.

In support of contentions, counsel relied upon the judgment

passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Hameed

Kunju vs. Nazimin, reported in (2017) 8 Supreme Court

Cases 611, wherein it has been held as under:-

“43. Before parting, we consider it apposite to

observe that the object of the Rent Laws all

over the State is to ensure speedy disposal of

eviction cases between the landlord and tenant

and especially those cases where the landlord

seek eviction for his bona fide need.

44. We sincerely feel that the eviction matters

should be given priority in their disposal at all

stages of litigation and especially where the

eviction is claimed on the ground of bona fide

need of the landlord. We hope and trust that

due attention would be paid by all courts to

ensure speedy disposal of eviction cases.“

In that view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to the Rent Tribunal, Jaipur No-2 Metropolitan-I

to decide the Rent Appeal No.481/2013 preferably within a period

of one year.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

JYOTI /143

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top