SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M/S PREM AND COMPANY (A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM) – Appellant
Versus
M/S SHARDA INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPERS – Respondent
ARBAP 131/2021



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Arbitration Application No. 131/2021

M/s Prem And Company (A Registered Partnership Firm), R-14,

Yudhishthir Marg, C-Scheme Jaipur Through Authorized

Representative Mr. Deepak Sharma,

----Petitioner

Versus

M/s Sharda Infrastructure Developers, Office At 60/f-3, Mohan

Apartments Prem Nagar-First, Gujar Ki Thadi, Jaipur - 302019

Through Sole Proprietor Mr Nitesh Sharma, Son Of Shri Inderjit

Sharma

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Mohd Adil

Mr. Saurabh Chatterjee for Mr. Sunil

Kumar Singh

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Saransh Saini with Mr. Sanjeev

Kumar

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

Judgment / Order

30/06/2022

1.

Matter comes up on a letter received from Justice N.K. Jain,

wherein he has mentioned that he has not accepted any matter

pertaining to arbitration and he is not taking up the matter and

has requested that some other Judge be appointed as an

arbitrator.

2.

I have perused the letter.

3.

Since Mr. Justice N.K. Jain (Retired Chief Justice, Madras

High Court) has shown his inability, hence I deem it proper to

appoint Mr. Justice Guman Singh (Retired Judge) as a sole

arbitrator.

(2 of 2)

[ARBAP-131/2021]

4.

This Court appoints Mr. Justice Guman Singh (Retired Judge),

C-254, Hans Marg Malviya Nagar, Jaipur as an Arbitrator to decide

the dispute.

5.

The appointment of the sole arbitrator is subject to the

declarations being made under Section 12 of the Arbitration &

Conciliation Act, 1996 with respect to independence and

impartiality, and the ability to devote sufficient time to complete

the arbitration within the prescribed period.

6.

The Arbitrator shall be entitled to lay down fees as provided

under Manual of Procedure for Alternative Disputes Resolution,

2009 as amended from time to time.

7.

Registry is directed to intimate Mr. Justice Guman Singh

(Retired Judge) and obtain his formal consent.

8.

Accordingly, letter stands disposed.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

ARTI SHARMA /15

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top