Advocates:
['S S HORA/T C SHARMA', 'P P', '', 'ANURAG SHARMA AAG']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR

O R D E R

1.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1329/2014

(Paras Jain Vs. State of Rajasthan)

2.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.131/2015

(Rajesh Tinker Vs. State of Rajasthan)

3.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1467/2014

(Man Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan)

4.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1353/2014

(Mukesh Kasera Vs. State of Rajasthan)

5.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1218/2014

(Sandeep Agarwal Vs. State of Rajasthan)

6.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1327/2014

(Shri Kant Lakhotiya Vs. State of Rajasthan)

7.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1352/2014

(Devendra Ranawat Vs. State of Rajasthan)

8.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1351/2014

(Gajendra Kumar Singhal & Anr.Vs. State of Rajasthan)

9.

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1328/2014

(Dinesh Singhal Vs. State of Rajasthan)

Date of Order

:::::::

04.07.2015

PRESENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL

REPORTABLE

Mr.Pankaj Gupta for accused-petitioners-Dinesh Singhal, Shri

Devendra Ranawat & Shri Shrikant Lakhotiya.

Mr. V.R.Bajwa, for accused-petitioners-Shri Gajendra Kumar Singhal

and Shri Laxmikant.

Mr.Mahendra Gaur, for accused-petitioners Shri Sandeep Agrawal and

Shri Mukesh Kasera.

Mr.R.K.Jain and

Mr.Vivek Goyal for accused-petitioner-Rajesh Tinker.

Mr.Harendra Singh for accused-petitioner-Man Singh,

Mr.S.S.Hora, for accused-petitioner Shri Paras Jain.

Mr.Anurag Sharma, Additional Advocate General with

Mr.Jagdish Nagar and Mr.Dhruv Rathore for the State.

****

2

BY THE COURT:

Some of the accused are before this Court by way of these

criminal revision petitions under Section 397 read with Section 401

Cr.P.C. to challenge the order dated 22.9.2014 passed by the Special

Judge (Prevention of Corruption Cases) No.1, Jaipur in Criminal Case

No.13/2014 whereby the learned trial Court ordered to frame charge

against the petitioners and co-accused against whom charge-sheet

was filed. It is to be noted that each of the accused-petitioner has been

discharged for some of the offences for which charge-sheet was filed

against them. As each of the petition has been filed against the same

order and most of the grounds of challenge are common, with the

consent of learned counsel for the parties, all the petitions were heard

together and are being disposed of by this common order.

Brief relevant facts for the disposal of these petitions are

that the Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur through some secret and

reliable source received information to the effect that accused-

petitioner-Shri Dinesh Singhal with the help of and in criminal

conspiracy with some public servants and other persons is involved in

the manufacturing and sale of “Fake Deshi Ghee” at a very large scale

in the brand names of several reputed companies and he thereby

playing with the health of public at large. On the basis of such

information, preliminary inquiry was undertaken by the agency and for

the verification of the same under the authority of competent person

mobile phones of Shri Dinesh Singhal were put on surveillance and as

a result thereof the source information was found to be true. In the

aforesaid back-drop FIR No.526/2013 was registered for various

3

offences against as many as sixty two persons and after due

investigation charge-sheet came to be filed against twenty one persons

including present petitions. It is said that against rest of the persons

investigation has been kept pending under Section 173 (8) Cr.P.C.

Learned trial Court after hearing both the parties, vide impugned order

directed to frame charge against all the accused against whom charge-

sheet was filed for various offences. Feeling aggrieved, some of them

are before this Court by way of these