HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
RAHUL YADAV SON OF SHRI SHAMBHU DAYAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 11562/2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D. B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 11562/2021
1.
Rahul Yadav Son of Shri Shambhu Dayal Yadav, aged
about 21 years, Resident of Village Thaloj, Gram
Panchayat - Chandsen, Tehsil - Lalsot, District - Dausa,
Rajasthan.
2.
Rajaram Meena Son of Shri Shrinarayan Meena, aged
about 31 years, Resident of Village Thaloj, Gram
Panchayat - Chandsen, Tehsil - Lalsot, District - Dausa,
Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State of Rajasthan, through Principal Secretary, Revenue
Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
District Collector, Dausa, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
3.
Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District
Dausa (Raj.)
4.
Tehsildar, Lalsot, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioners
:
Mr. Manoj Bhardwaj Advocate with Mr.
Rajesh Chaturvedi Advocate.
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
06/10/2021
Petitioners have filed this public interest litigation in
connection with illegal encroachment and obstruction over pasture
land bearing Khasra No. 401/217 and 391/144 measuring 47.22
hectares situated at Village Thaloj, Gram Panchayat Chandsen,
Tehsil Lalsot, District Dausa, Rajasthan.
(2 of 4)
[CW-11562/2021]
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that
this Court vide order dated 01.03.2019 passed in Anand Kumar
Vs. State of Rajasthan & Others (D. B. P.I.L. Petition No.
4419/2019) has directed the petitioner therein to approach the
respondents by filing a detailed representation, who were further
required to examine the grievances of the petitioner therein and
do the needful within a period of three months from the date of
filing of the representation.
Order dated 01.03.2019 passed in Anand Kumar Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Others (D. B. P.I.L. Petition No. 4419/2019)
reads as under:
“This public interest litigation petition has been
filed by the petitioner contending that he is
resident of Village Bass Bijoli, Tehsil Surajgarh,
District Jhunjhunu. Certain residents of that
village have made illegal encroachments on
charagah land (pond/johad) bearing Khasra No.
139/38 which has resulted into obstruction of the
flow of water into village pond/johad and deprived
the villagers of its use. It is contended that
Circular dated 25.04.2011 has been issued by the
State Government in compliance of judgment of
the Supreme Court in Jagpal Singh & Others Vs.
State of Punjab & others, AIR 2011 SC 1123
whereby allotment or regularisation of charagah
land/catchments of a pond/water reservoirs and
ponds for private or commercial purposes has
been stopped with immediate effect. Tehsildar,
Surajgarh vide order dated 26.11.2018 has
declared them trespassers on charagah land and
directed the Inspector (L.R.) and Patwari Halka to
remove their illegal encroachments. Notices have
also been served on the encroachers in pursuance
of the aforesaid order. However, the trespassers
have refused to remove the encroachments. The
Inspector (LR) prepared a report with the help of
Patwari Halka on 04.01.2019 stating that there is
an apprehension of disturbance of peace at the
site and removal of encroachment is possible only
with the help of JCB machines, tractors and police
force etc. It is submitted that the encroachers are
being provided electricity connection and the poles
have also been erected over the disputed land. It
is quite possible that after providing electricity
(3 of 4)
[CW-11562/2021]
connections, the charagah land will be
allotted/regularised in favour of the encroachers.
This Court vide order dated 30.01.2019
passed in Jagdish Prasad Meena & Others Vs.
State of Rajasthan & Others, D.B. Civil Writ
Petition (PIL) No. 10819/2018 took note of fact
that large number of writ petitions are being filed
before this Cour