Advocates:
['V D GATHALA', '', 'LOKESH KUMAR SHARMA', 'AMRIT PRASAD SHARMA', '', 'RAJESH MOONDIA', 'RAJENDRA PRASAD', 'DHARMENDRA PAREEK', 'DEEPAK SHARMA']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

AT JAIPUR BENCH

ORDER

Moti Bhawan Grah Nirman Sahakari Samiti Ltd. Vs. Harphool Khatik & Others

(S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1693/2012)

Date of Order:

December 11

th, 2014.

PRESENT

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA

Mr. Lokesh Sharma, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Deepak Sharma] for respondents.

Mr. Rajesh Moondia]

BY THE COURT:

This writ petition purporting to be both under Articles 226 and 227

of the Constitution of India impugns the judgment dated 17-1-2012

passed by the Divisional Commissioner Jaipur whereby the appeal filed by

the respondent-appellants (hereinafter `the respondents') under Section

90-B (7) of the Rajasthan Land Revenue Act, 1956 (hereinafter `the 1956

Act') has been allowed and the judgment dated 12-4-2010 passed by the

Authorised Officer Zone-6, Jaipur Development Authority Jaipur under

Section 90-B of the 1956 Act has been set aside.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also respondents and

2

perused the impugned order dated 17-1-2012 as also the underlying

order dated 12-4-2010 passed by the authorised officer under Section 90-

B of the 1956 Act.

Counsel for the petitioner has sub