SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
SMT. KRISHNA DEVI W/O SHRI SARDARMAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 7684/2022



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7684/2022

Smt. Krishna Devi W/o Shri Sardarmal, Aged About 34 Years,

R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura,

District Jaipur.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

2.

The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3.

The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural (Raj.).

4.

The Station House Officer, Police Station Pragpura, District

Jaipur Rural (Raj.).

5.

Mukesh S/o Banwari Balai, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

6.

Rajesh S/o Arjun Lal Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

7.

Jonny S/o Arjun Lal Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

8.

Sayar S/o Omprakash Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

9.

Manoj Kuldeep S/o Omprakash Raigar, R/o Ambedkar

Nagar, Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District

Jaipur.

10.

Ajay S/o Hansraj Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

11.

Chandrapal S/o Ghanshyam Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar,

Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

12.

Naveen Kuldeep S/o Jairam Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar,

Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

13.

Subhash Kuldeep S/o Prakash, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

14.

Rohitash S/o Panchuram Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

15.

Narendra Kuldeep S/o Chetram Raigar, R/o Ambedkar

Nagar, Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District

Jaipur.

(2 of 3)

[CRLMP-7684/2022]

16.

Vijendra S/o Gendram Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

17.

Akshar Kuldeep S/o Kamlesh Raigar, R/o Ambedkar

Nagar, Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District

Jaipur.

18.

Ramkaran S/o Unknown, R/o Ambedkar Nagar, Tan

Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

19.

Ramprasad S/o Hanuman Sahai Raigar, R/o Ambedkar

Nagar, Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District

Jaipur.

20.

Dana Ram S/o Hajari Lal Raigar, R/o Ambedkar Nagar,

Tan Badnagar, Police Station Pragpura, District Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Mahendra Meena, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

Order

15/12/2022

The petitioner has preferred this petition for issuance of

necessary directions to the official-respondents to provide

adequate security and protection to them on the ground that they

are facing grave threat of their life and liberty at the hands of

private respondents No.5 to 20.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Article 21 of

the Constitution of India provides for right to life and personal

liberty under the ambit of fundamental rights and any threat to

the same amounts to violation of the same.

It is well settled legal position as expounded by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the cases of Lata Singh Vs. State of UP,

reported in AIR 2006 SC 2522, S. Khushboo Vs.

Kanniammal, reported in (2010) 5 SCC 600, Indra Sarma

(3 of 3)

[CRLMP-7684/2022]

Vs. VKV Sarma reported in (2013) 15 SCC 755 and Shafin

Jahan Vs. Asokan KM reported in (2018) 16 SCC 368 that

the life and personal liberty of the individuals has to be protected

except according to procedure established by law, as mandated by

Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Further, as per Section 29 of

the Rajasthan Police Act, 2007 every police officer is duty bound

to protect the life and liberty of the citizens.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties as well as

perusing the record of the case, since the petitioners apprehend

threat to their right of life and liberty, this Court disposes of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top