SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
PAVAN KUMAR KAUSHIK S/O SHRI RADHEYSHYAM KAUSHIK – Appellant
Versus
SHRI NATHUMAL PAHADIYA, PRESIDENT PUBLIC LAND PROTECTION CELL (PLPC) – Respondent
CCP/872/2021



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 872/2021

In

D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018

Pawan Kumar Kaushik S/o Shri Radheyshyam Kaushik, R/o Plot

No. 7 Yugal Vihar Colony, Near Radha Public School, Goverdhan

District Mathura, Uttar Pradesh- 281502

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Shri Nanumal Pahadiya, President Public Land Protection

Cell (Plpc), Cum District Collector, District Alwar ,

Rajasthan- 301001

2.

Shri Rakesh Kumar-I Oic Revenue And Adm-1, District

Collector, District Alwar, Rajasthan-301001

3.

Shri Rakesh Kumar Meena, Sdo And Sdm Bansur, Bansur,

Alwar Rajasthan-301402

4.

Shri Jagdish Prasad Land Holder Cum Tehsildar, Bansur

Alwar, Rajasthan-301402

5.

Shri Niranjan Kumar Arya, Chief Secretary Of Rajasthan

Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan 302005

6.

Shri Anand Kumar Principal Secretary Department Of

Revenue Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan-

302005

7.

Shri K.l. Swami Joint Revenue Secretary Of Rajasthan,

Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302005

8.

Shri Dinesh Kumar Yadav, Divisional Commissioner,

Jaipur, Division Mini Secretariat Building Near Sawai Jai

Singh Circle, Bani Park, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302016

9.

State Of Rajasthan Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat,

Jaipur.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Mohit Gupta Advocate.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

(2 of 2)

[CCP-872/2021]

Order

18/01/2022

Heard.

This contempt petition has been filed alleging willful

disobedience of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed in D.B. Civil

Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by the

aforesaid order, this Court has directed the PLPC created at the

district level to take action against removal of encroachment. It is

submitted that the present petitioner had also preferred

representation, but action has not been taken.

It appears that in view of the order, referred to above, this

court observed that the number of petitions are being filed

alleging inaction against encroachments. This Court, therefore,

directed constitution of a committee known as Public Land

Protection Cell (PLPC) that such committee shall examine and

verify encroachments.

It appears that the present petitioner has not filed any

petition before this Court, but moved application before the

concerned PLPC.

Therefore, at this stage, we are not inclined to issue any

notice of contempt, but we would direct the concerned PLPC to

examine the complaint of the petitioner and take necessary action,

if any encroachment is found, within a reasonable period and as

far as possible within three months.

Petition stands disposed off.

(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J

(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J

Sanjay Kumawat-12

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top