HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
VINODNATH S/O SHRI BANNANATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB 17208/2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17208/2021
Vinodnath S/o Shri Bannanath, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
Kalbeliya Ki Dhani, Pronheda (Ramkhede), P.s. Kekri, Dist.
Ajmer. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Vinay Pal Yadav
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
09/11/2021
1.
The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner
who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR No.98/2021
registered at Police Station Kekri, District Ajmer for the offence(s)
under Sections 363, 366, 344, 376 (2) (n) of IPC. and Section
3/4, 5 (L)/6 of POCSO Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
prosecutrix had eloped with the petitioner and remained for more
than five-six months. Both lived together at different places. They
took a rented house and lived there as husband and wife. They
used to go for labouring for their livelihood. She left the house of
her parents on 30.02.2021 and were apprehended on 14.07.2021.
In the meantime, she made no complain to anyone.
3.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail
application stating that the matter pertains to the sexual abuses of
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-17208/2021]
a minor and comes within the purview of POCSO Act., therefore,
the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail.
4.
Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the
parties and the case diary more, particularly the statement of the
prosecutrix, the period they lived together, the statement of one
landlord-Satya Narain where the petitioner and the prosecutirx
lived together; without expressing any opinion on the merits of
the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the
petitioner on bail.
5.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner -
Vinodnath S/o Shri Bannanath shall be enlarged on bail
provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/-
with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned
on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
TN/50