HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
MOHAN LAL YOGI S/O SHRI MANGI LAL YOGI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CW 13205/2022
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.13205/2022
Mohan Lal Yogi S/o Shri Mangi Lal Yogi, Aged About 48 Years,
Resident Of V.P.O. Hathoj, District Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302012.
Mob. No.9649429435
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Urban
Development And Housing Department, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
The Jaipur Development Authority, J.L.N. Marg, Jaipur
through Its Commissioner.
3.
District Collector, Jaipur.
4.
Tehsildar, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Akhilesh Pareek, Advocate for
Mr. Palash Shrivastav, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order
09/09/2022
Instant Public Interest Litigation petition has been filed with
the following prayer:-
“(i) the entire revenue record of the land bearing
That the Khata No.106 Khasras No.1, 2, 3, 4/1, 5/1,
8, 9/2, 10, 18/2, 19, 21, 22, 25/1/26/231, 26/5,
44/3, 46/1, 47, 71, 72, 79, 80, 114, 115, 116, 117/2,
117/232, 118/2, 118/233, 119/2, 123/234, 124, 132
to 138, 153, 157/1 to 157/5, 158 to 179, 180 to 182,
205, 216/2 total 71 area of 4604251 hc, is shown in
Jamabandi in the name of the JDA Khata No.167
khasras No.54 to 58 total 5 area 5.4632 hc and other
Khasra numbers shown in Jamabandi samvat 2073-
2076 (year 2019) in the name of Mandir Murti Shri
Kalyan Ji Maharaj, Hathoj, Jaipur and also the Khata
(2 of 3)
[CW-13205/2022]
No.56 Khasra Nos.24/237, 24/238, 24/239, 24/240,
24/241, 24/242, 24/243, 24/244, 24/245, 24/246,
24/247, 24/248 and 26/236 total 13 area 5.4380 hc.
Shown in Jamabandi samvat 2073-2076 (year 2019)
District Jaipur Tehsil Jaipur, Bid Hathoj, Jaipur is in the
name of Mandir Murti Shri Kalyan Ji Maharaj, Hathoj,
Jaipur which is shown in Khata No.106 and Khasra
No.318, 319 as talai may kindly be called for and the
respondent authorities may kindly be directed to
remove the unauthorized encroachment on the above
land of Khasra numbers in the large interest of justice
and the concerned Authorities be directed to recover
the amount from the person who encroached on the
government land;
(ii) issue direction to the Respondents to restore
the possession of the Savaichak/talai mela maidan
pasture land and also a direction be issued to restore
the possession if the other land belongs to deity;
(iii) issue any other order or direction which this
Hon’ble Court may deem just, fit and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case may also passed
in favour of the petitioner.”
A Division Bench of this Court in the matter of Jagdish
Prashad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., D.B.
Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No. 10819/ 2018 vide order dated
30.01.2019 has directed creation of Public Land Protection Cell
(PLPC) for rural areas in every district.
Counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be
permitted to submit a representation before the PLPC and
respondents be directed to dispose off the same within a period of
two months.
In that view of the matter, the writ petition stands disposed
off, in view of the directions issued by the Division Bench in the
matter of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra) and the petitioner is
at liberty to make a representation before PLPC and the
respondents are directed to decide the same within a period of
two months.
(3 of 3)
[CW-13205/2022]
Considering that this petition has been disposed off at the
motion stage without issuing notice to the respondents, it is made
clear that this Court has not commented upon the merits of the
case, but only directed inquiry on the complaint as per the order
passed in the case of Jagdish Prashad Meena (supra).
It is further directed that in the inquiry for removal of the
encroachment, the persons, who are alleged to be encroachers,
shall be afforded an opportunity of hearing.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIV