SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
RAJENDRA SINGH SON OF HARI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Order

17/12/2020 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned District & Sessions Judge, Dholpur, has erred in not allowing the application under Section 457 Cr.P.C. for handing over in Supurdagi the cash recovered from the petitioner’s house which the petitioner claimed as his own. It is submitted that the amount recovered were seized from the cupboard of the petitioner’s room in his own house will be treated as his own property and accordingly, it is required to be released to the petitioner.

Learned counsel relies upon the judgment passed by this Court in S.B Criminal Misc. (Petition) No.4165/2020: Narendra Kumar Harsh Versus State of Rajasthan decided on 04.11.2020 whereby this Court after considering the law relating to release of cash amount recovered in any case has directed as under:-

I have considered the submissions.

In MECTEC Firm Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra)

delivered by me, I had considered the law laid down in Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai & ors. (supra) wherein the Supreme Court has observed with regard to release of valuable articles and currency notes as under:

"11. With regard to valuable articles, such as golden or sliver ornaments or articles studded with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top