HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SMT CHANDRESH KUMARI SUMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE FOOD CIVIL SUPPLY ORS – Respondent
CW 5574/2012
{1} SB CIVIL WRIT PET. 5574/2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5574/2012
SMT. CHANDRESH KUMARI SUMAN
Vs.
STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.
DATE:30.05.2012
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I
Mr. Keshav Agarwal, for the petitioner.
****
Heard the learned counsel for
petitioner.
2.
Learned counsel for petitioner does
not dispute that impugned order dated
02.03.2012 passed by the District Collector
(Supply), Baran is appealable under clause
(b) of sub-Section (1) of Section 22 of
Rajasthan Foodgrains & Other Essential
Articles (Regulation of Distribution) Order,
1976.
3.
Submission of the learned counsel
for petitioner is that respondents have not
considered their own guidelines and have
passed the order, contrary to the guidelines
issued by the respondents, therefore, this
Court can entertain the writ petition
directly also.
{2} SB CIVIL WRIT PET. 5574/2012
4.
In my view, an alternative remedy by
way of statutory appeal is available to the
petitioner and whatever submissions which
have been advanced in this writ petition, can
be advanced before the Appellate Authority
also.
5.
In these circumstances, I am not
inclined to entertain this writ petition and
the same deserves to be dismissed only on the
ground of availability of alternative remedy.
6.
The writ petition is, accordingly,
dismissed. Stay application is also
dismissed.
7.
It is needless to mention that
petitioner will have a right to file an
appeal, in accordance with law.
(NARENDRA KUMAR JAIN-I),J.
/KKC/
Certificate:
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the
judgment/order being emailed.
KAMLESH KUMAR
P.A.