1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B.  CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.5050/2015

S.B. CIVIL MISC. STAY APPL. NO.4534/2015

KAMLESH KUMARI VS. STATE & ANR.

DATE OF ORDER 

:

:

 3^rd September, 2015

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

*******

Shri Anil Kumar for the petitioner

##

This   writ   petition   has   been   filed   by   the

petitioner with the prayer that the respondents be

directed to provide appointment to her on the post

of Teacher Gr.III as per the marks secured by her

in   the   examination   after   adding   the   prescribed

percentage of the RTET marks with all consequential

benefits.

Petitioner   applied   for   the   post   of   Teacher

Gr.III (Level‐II). She was allowed to appear in the

examination   with   Roll   No.21113580   in   OBC   (WE)

category.   In   the   result,   she   was   shown   to   have

secured   total   150.40   marks   in   the   written

examination. 20% marks secured by each candidate in

the RTET shall have to be added to the total marks

secured   by   the   candidate   in   the   recruitment

examination for appointment on the post of Teacher

Gr.III.  Petitioner  has secured 94 marks in RTET,

20% of which is 18.8. Thus if the aforesaid marks

is   added   to   the   marks   obtained   by   her   in   the

2

written   test,   the   total   will   come   to   169.2

(150.40+18.80)   marks,   whereas   the   candidates

secured   lower   marks   than   her,   have   been   so

appointed. Petitioner has given examples of Nirmala

Roll No.21111421, who has secured 167.22 marks in

unreserved   category   and   Suman   Kumari,   Roll

No.21111575, OBC category, who has secured 164.26,

yet they have been given appointment.

For   the   grievance   like   the   present   one,

instead of directly entertaining the writ petition,

petitioner is set at liberty to approach the Chief

Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Churu, who shall

examine the grievance of the petitioner as to why

she has not been appointed despite having higher

merit   and   decide   the   said   representation   by

speaking   order   addressing   grievance   of   the

petitioner   within   two   months   from   the   date   of

making such representation by the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Stay application also stands disposed of.

    (Mohammad Rafiq),J.

RS/14

All corrections made in the judgement/order have been incorporated in the judgement/order being

emailed. (Ravi Sharma,P.A.)