HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
ROOP SINGH S/O SHANKAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS 1874 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1874/2021
1.
Roop Singh S/o Shankar Singh, R/o Rajpura Bochan, P.s.
Jawaja, Dist. Ajmer (Raj) (At Present Confined In District
Jail Ajmer)
2.
Smt. Laxmi Devi W/o Roop Singh, R/o Rajpura Bochan,
P.s. Jawaja, Dist. Ajmer (Raj) (At Present Confined In
District Jail Ajmer)
----Appellants
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
2.
Shukha Ram S/o Mangla Ram, R/o Rajpura Blochan,
Jawaja, Dist. Ajmer
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Amit Dadhich
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Mehla,PP
Mr. Deshraj Kalwania
Mr. Kundan Kanwaria, IPS. A.S.P.
Beawar
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
14/12/2021
The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A (2) of
SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant,
who is in custody in connection with FIR No.333/2021 registered
at Police Station Jawaja, Ajmer for the offences under Sections
306 of IPC.
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that on an
accusation of committing offence of abetment of suicide, the
police arrested the appellants and after investigation they have
been chargesheeted. Learned counsel for the appellants submits
(2 of 3)
[CRLAS-1874/2021]
that the essential ingredients to constitute an offence under
Section 306 of IPC is conspicuously missing in the entire charge-
sheet. He submits that the word abetment has been defined under
Section 107 of the IPC; as per which there must be an instigation
and that instigation must be for the committal of suicide. Learned
counsel for the appellants submits that prior to three and four
days of the incident an FIR came to be lodged at the behest of the
appellant party against the accused who is deceased now. For the
accusation of committing offence under Section 452, 354, 323 and
379 of IPC however in stead of taking investigation in the matter
deceased was apprehended by the police as a preventive measure
by resorting provisions under Section 107 and 154 of Cr.P.C. and
as a matter of fact after his release by the executive Magistrate on
the next date was found hanged near by the police station. In
these circumstances, he submits that there is nothing on the basis
of which it can be inferred or presumed that it were the police,
who instigated the deceased to end his life. He further submits
that the trial would likely to take time and their further
incarceration in this matter would not be served for any purpose.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for
the complainant has opposed the bail plea.
Learned counsel for the complainant submits that the
investigation has not been done in this matter fairly.
Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances as
available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments
advanced, I am of the opinion that the appellants deserve to be
enlarged on bail.
(3 of 3)
[CRLAS-1874/2021]
Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 30.10.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST
(Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Ajmer is set aside. It is ordered
that the accused-appellants (1) Roop Singh S/o Shankar
Singh, and (2) Smt. Laxmi Devi W/o Roop Singh, arrested in
connection with the aforesaid FIR shall be released on bail
provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear
before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called
upon to do so.
Mr. Kundan Kanwaria, IPS. A.S.P. Beawar, who is present in
person, is discharged.
(FARJAND ALI),J
TN/34