Order

15/12/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed additional affidavit pointed out that due to inadvertence, certain performa- respondents could not be added as party respondents in the present writ petition. Along with the additional affidavit, amended cause title also has been filed.

Considering the additional affidavit submitted by the petitioner, the amended cause title is taken on record.

Heard on the application No.2/2022 for dispensing with the service upon performa-respondent Nos. 8 & 9.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Service upon the performa- respondent Nos. 8 & 9 stands dispensed.

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-non-

applicant challenging the order dated 14.10.2017, whereby, the application filed on behalf of the petitioner-non-applicant under Order 1 Rule 10 C.P.C. for impleading Sh. Sumit Bhatia as -non-

applicant in the application was dismissed by the trial Court.

The brief facts of the case are that the non-applicants No. 1 to 7 filed an application seeking compensation under Fatal Accidents Act, 1855, on account of death of Sh. Sunil Kumar. During pendency of the proceedings, the petitioner has filed an ap