SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN
MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
KAMLESH SON OF KALULAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/14775/2022



In cases involving allegations of rape under the POCSO Act, the absence of a rape allegation in the prosecutrix's statement recorded under Section 164 CrPC, coupled with the accused's lack of criminal antecedents and other mitigating factors, may be considered by the court in granting bail.

Headnote:

BAIL - POCSO ACT - SECTION 3/4 - STATEMENT OF PROSECUTRIX - ABSENCE OF RAPE ALLEGATION - BAIL GRANTED

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a 20-year-old boy, was arrested for allegedly committing rape under Section 376 of the IPC and Section 3/4 of the POCSO Act. The statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 CrPC did not contain any allegation of rape.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the statement of the prosecutrix did not contain any allegation of rape, and that the petitioner had no criminal antecedents. The court also considered the petitioner's age and the length of his custody.

Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail in light of the absence of rape allegation in the prosecutrix's statement and the petitioner's lack of criminal antecedents.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the absence of rape allegation in the prosecutrix's statement, the petitioner's age, his lack of criminal antecedents, and the length of his custody were all factors that weighed in favor of granting him bail.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed that the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

SAHIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14775/2022

Kamlesh Son Of Kalulal, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Nayagaon,

Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar ( At Present Accused

Confined In Jail Jhalawar)

----Accused/Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Dushyant Singh Naruka

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Riyasat Ali, PP

Mr. Rohit Khandelwal

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL

Order

10/01/2023

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR

No.476/2022 registered at Police Station Aklera, District Jhalawar

for the offence(s) under Section(s) 376 of I.P.C. and Section 3/4 of

POCSO Act, 2012.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he, a boy of

20 years of age, has falsely been implicated in this case. Inviting

attention of this Court towards the statement of the prosecutrix

recorded under Section 164 CrPC, learned counsel submits that it

is bereft of any allegation of rape upon her. He submits that the

petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2022, charge-sheet has been

filed, trial of the case will take time, he has no criminal

antecedents and prays for his release on bail.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-14775/2022]

Although, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned

counsel for the complainant opposed the prayer; but, could not

dispute that the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under

Section 164 CrPC does not contain any allegation of rape.

Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by

learned counsels for the respective parties, material available in

the case diary especially, the statement of the prosecutrix

recorded under Section 164 CrPC, age of the petitioner, his length

of custody and absence of criminal antecedents; but, without

expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court

deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed

that accused-petitioner Kamlesh Son Of Kalulal shall be

released on bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in connection with

afore-mentioned FIR registered at concerned Police Station,

provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/-

(Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of

Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction

of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall comply with all

the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C.

(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J

PRAGATI/26

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top