HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
FARJAND ALI
DEEPAK SAHU @ DEEPAK KACHORI S/O VASU DEV SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS/1990/2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1990/2021
Deepak Sahu @ Deepak Kachori S/o Vasu Dev Sahu, Aged About
22 Years, R/o Pratap Colony Mevadi Get Bahar Beawar, Police
Station Beawar City District Ajmer (Raj) (At Present In Central
Jail Ajmer)
----Appellant
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
2.
Shri Tyasan Pandit S/o Shri Ashok Pandit, R/o Ambedkar
Nagar Church Road Beawar Police Station Beawar City,
District Ajmer (Raj)
----Respondents
For Appellant(s)
:
Mr. Surendra Singh
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
Mr. Shashank Shekhar Pachauri
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI
Order
10/03/2022
1.
The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14(A)(2)
SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant,
who is in custody in connection with FIR No.428/2021, Police
Station Beawar City, District Ajmer, for the offences under
Sections 143, 341, 323, 379, 427 of IPC and Sections 3(1)(r),
3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for
the complainant and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the
material available on record.
3.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that
the incident of assault happened on 13.05.2021, however, the MLC
(2 of 2)
[CRLAS-1990/2021]
of the same was prepared on 14.06.2021, after radiological
examination, the injuries have been described as grievous and
dangerous to life. After investigation charge-sheet has been filed.
The appellant is in custody in this matter since 23.07.2021,
therefore, benefit of bail may be granted to the appellant.
4.
Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for
the complainant have opposed the appeal.
5.
Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances as
available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments
advanced, I am of the opinion that the appellant deserves to be
enlarged on bail. It is submitted that the appellant shall be
released on bail upon furnishing a separate undertaking that he
shall not in any manner try to harass the complainant party.
6.
Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned
order dated 24.11.2021 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST
(Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, is quashed and set aside. It is
ordered that the accused-appellant-Deepak Sahu @ Deepak
Kachori S/o Vasu Dev Sahu arrested in connection with
aforesaid FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other
case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- and
two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned
trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all
dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(FARJAND ALI),J
RAJAT KUMAR/162
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.