SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN - HIGH COURT BENCH AT JAIPUR
LAKHAN AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJESH GOSWAMI', 'P P', '', 'ANIL UPMAN']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT

JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Revision No. 679 / 2016

Lakhan And Ors

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan And Anr

----Respondent

_____________________________________________________

For Petitioner(s) : Shri Nirmal Kumar

For Respondent(s) : Shri V.S. Godara, PP

Shri Anil Upman

_____________________________________________________

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYAS

Order

17/05/2017

By this petition, order dated 18.5.2016 passed u/s 190

Cr.P.C. by Additional Sessions Judge No.2, Bharatpur has been assailed

whereby cognizance for offence u/s 147, 148, 149, 323, 341 325 and

307 IPC has been taken against the petitioners and they have been

summoned by bailable warrants.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no

iota of evidence available in the statements of witnesses recorded u/s

161 Cr.P.C. Later on, when the matter was entrusted to other

Investigating Officer, supplementary statements u/s 161 Cr.P.C. were

recorded and only therein names of the petitioners were introduced into

the matter. Police after completing investigation, while submitting

chargesheet, has concluded that on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top