HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SURAJ MAURYA ALIAS BAWAA S/O SHRI RAM CHANDRA, – Appellant
Versus
BABLU MAALI S/O SHRI MISHRILAL MAALI, – Respondent
CRLMP 6596 2023
[2023:RJ-JP:29318]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6596/2023
1.
Suraj Maurya Alias Bawaa S/o Shri Ram Chandra,
Resident Of Gadriyan Tola, Auras Tehsil Hasanganj,
District Unnaav, Uttar Pradesh - 241503
2.
Shivam Alias Shubham S/o Shri Dinesh Kumar, Residnet
Of Auras Chamraudha-2, Tehsil Hasanganj, District
Unnaav, Uttar Pradesh - 241 503
3.
Saroj Kumar S/o Shri Dinesh Kumar, Residnet Of Auras
Chamraudha-2, Tehsil Hasanganj, District Unnaav, Uttar
Pradesh - 241 503
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
Bablu Maali S/o Shri Mishrilal Maali, Resident Of Maaliyon
Ki Baadi, Gram Panchayat Maaliyon Ki Baadi, Tehsil
Kishangarh, District Ajmer, Rajasthan
2.
State Government, Through Public Prosecutor, Ajmer
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Kritesh Oswal
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Chandragupt Chopra, PP
Mr. Nitesh Trivedi
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
13/10/2023
1.
The parties are present in person and have been duly
identified by their respective counsel.
2.
By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused-petitioners have
approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR
No.286/2022 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar, District
Ajmer for the offence punishable under Section 380 of IPC and the
[2023:RJ-JP:29318]
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-6596/2023]
proceedings pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate No.2, Kishangarh, District Ajmer.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during
pendency of the investigation, the petitioners have entered into a
compromise with the complainant. The written compromise has
been annexed with this petition.
4.
Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the
complainant do not dispute the factum of compromise.
5.
In view of the aforesaid and considering the submissions
made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made
available for my perusal; considering that the parties have
resolved their dispute and also finding that the present case is
wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the
Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab &
Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of
State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors.
[AIR 1992 SC 604], the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in
view of compromise arrived at between the parties.
6.
In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed
and the FIR No.286/2022 registered at Police Station Gandhi
Nagar, District Ajmer and the proceedings pending before learned
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.2, Kishangarh, District
Ajmer are quashed and set aside.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
857-Nirmala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.