HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
ARSHAD KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP – Respondent
CRLMB 4761/2015
-1-
S.B.Cri Misc.Bail Application No.4761/2015.
Arshad Khan. VERSUS State of Rajasthan.
S.B.Criminal Misc.Bail Application No.4761/2015.
Arshad Khan. VERSUS State of Rajasthan.
02.06.2015
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
(VACATION JUDGE)
Mr.Dhanna Ram, Counsel for petitioner.
Mr.Sudesh Saini, Public Prosecutor.
*****
The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail u/Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
in a case arising out of FIR No.248 of 2014 registered at Police
Station Bhiwadi, District Alwar for offence u/Sec.279, 336, 379
& 120-B I.P.C. and Sec.41 & 42 of the Forest Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the
petitioner is being involved in the case only because Registration
Certificate of the truck, which has been apprehended carrying
stone, was in his name although he had sold the truck to one
Imran on 03.03.2014 i.e. a month before the FIR was registered.
He further states that Driver of the truck namely Ansar who was
apprehended at the spot has already been released on bail.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced before the
court, a copy of the power of attorney dt.03.03.2014 wherein it
is mentioned that the truck has been sold to Imran and
henceforth he shall be responsible for any untoward incident in
connection with the truck. A photo copy of power of attorney
dt.03.03.2014 is taken on record.
Per contra, the learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the
anticipatory bail application.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I
-2-
S.B.Cri Misc.Bail Application No.4761/2015.
Arshad Khan. VERSUS State of Rajasthan.
deem it to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the
petitioner.
Consequently, the instant bail application u/Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
stands allowed and it is order that in the event of arrest of
petitioner Arshad Khan S/o Shree Sher Mohammad in
connection with FIR No.248/2014 registered at Police Station
Bhiwadi, District Alwar for offence u/Sec.279, 336, 379 & 120-B
I.P.C. and 41 & 42 of the Forest Act, he shall be released on bail
to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. The petitioner shall
undertake to abide by the conditions stipulated u/Sec.438(2)
Cr.P.C. and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as &
when called for.
(ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL), V.J.
All corrections made in judgment/order have been
All corrections made in judgment/order have been
incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.
incorporated in the judgment/order being emailed.
Solanki DS, Sr.P.A.
Solanki DS, Sr.P.A.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.