SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA
VIJAY SINGH S/O MUKESH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/20791/2021



In cases of no injury, bail may be granted even if the offence is serious.

Headnote:

BAIL - SECTION 307 IPC - NO INJURY - BAIL GRANTED

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners were arrested in connection with an FIR for the offence under Sections 307, 34 IPC. The petitioners argued that they were wrongly implicated and that it was a case of no injury.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioners had been in jail since 09.11.2021 and that the chargesheet had been filed. The court also noted that the conclusion of the trial may take a long time.

Issues: Whether the petitioners should be granted bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that it was just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and ordered that the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 20791/2021

1.

Vijay Singh S/o Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 20 Years, R/o

Jaguwas Ps Behror Distt. Alwar Raj. (Petitioner Is In J.c.

At Sub Jail Behror Distt. Alwar)

2.

Karmpal S/o Inder Singh, Aged About 20 Years, R/o

Jaguwas Ps Behror Distt. Alwar Raj. (Petitioner Is In J.c.

At Sub Jail Behror Distt. Alwar)

----Petitioners

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. Pankaj Agarwal

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. Sher Singh Mahla, PP.

Mr. Rajneesh Gupta

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA

Order

04/01/2022

1.

The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR

No.842/2021 Registered at Police Station Behror, District Police

Bhiwadi, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Sections 307, 34

IPC.

2.

Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have

been wrongly implicated in this case. Petitioner is behind the bars

since 09.11.2021. Chargesheet has been filed against the

petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it is a

case of no injury. Conclusion of trial may take long time.

(2 of 2)

[CRLMB-20791/2021]

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the

complainant have opposed the bail application.

4.

Considering the contentions put-forth by the counsel for the

petitioners and taking into account the facts and circumstances of

the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners

on bail.

5.

Accordingly, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is

allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners Vijay Singh

S/o Mukesh Kumar and Karmpal S/o Inder Singh shall be

enlarged on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond

in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to

the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance

before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and

when called upon to do so.

(NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J

Seema/145

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top