HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
ANURADHA SHARMA D/O LATE KANHAIYA LAL W/O DR. AMARNATH SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
MUKESH S/O MAHARAJ SINGH – Respondent
CW 350/2022
['J K MOOLCHANDANI', 'JATIN AGARWAL', 'DINESH CHAND GUPTA', 'ANKIT AGRAWAL', 'SAURABH BHANDARI']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 350/2022
1.
Anuradha Sharma D/o Late Kanhaiya Lal W/o Dr.
Amarnath Sharma, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Kasba
Bayana At Present R/o C-376A, Malviya Nagar, Jaipur.
2.
Vishnudutta Sharma S/o Late Ranjeet, Aged About 64
Years, R/o Bayana At Present R/o C-114, Ranjeet Nagar,
Bharatpur.
3.
Sunil Dutta Sharma S/o Late Kanhaiya Lal, Aged About 50
Years, R/o Chhitam Teela Town Bayana, Tehsil Bayana,
District Bharatpur.
----Petitioners/Plaintiffs
Versus
1.
Mukesh S/o Maharaj Singh, Aged About 41 Years, R/o
Supa Market, Kasba Bayana, Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur.
2.
Tejsingh S/o Hariya, R/o Supa Tehsil Bayana, District
Bharatpur.
3.
Nagar Palika Bayana, Through Executive Officer, Nagar
Palika Board, Bayana, District Bharatpur.
Respondents-Defendants
4.
Kamlesh Sharma W/o Kshetrapal Sharma, Aged About 74
Years, R/o Jain Gali, Kasba Bayana, District Bharatpur
(Raj.)
5.
Shishi Prabha Sharma W/o Arun Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 68 Years, R/o 21/12, Shripura,kota (Raj.)
6.
Kusumlata Sharma W/o Sushil Kumar Sharma, Aged
About 66 Years, R/o Near Dauji Ka Mandir, Sakatpura,
Kota (Raj.)
----Proforma Respondents/Defendants
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. J.K. Moolchandani
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Jatin Agarwal
Mr. Dinesh Chand Gupta
Mr. Saurabh Bhandari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
(2 of 2)
[CW-350/2022]
Order
29/06/2022
This writ petition, which has been filed under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India assailing the legality and validity of the
order dated 23.11.2021 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Bayana
in Civil Miscellaneous Case No.80/2021, is being disposed of in
following terms on the request and with the consent of learned
counsels for the respective parties:-
1.
The order dated 23.11.2021 is quashed
and set aside.
2.
The respondents/applicants would be at
liberty to file a fresh application seeking
appointment of local Commissioner which shall
be decided by the learned trial Court in
accordance with law.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Manish/174