HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
SHIKHA RATHORE W/O SHRI DILEEP SINGH RATHORE D/O SHRI VINOD KUMAR SABU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
HC 269/2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 269/2019
Shikha Rathore W/o Shri Dileep Singh Rathore D/o Shri Vinod
Kumar Sabu, R/o Om Enclave, Plot No. A-105/b, Janta Colony,
Jaipur (Rajasthan)
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary,
Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2.
Shri Dileep Singh Rathore S/o Late Brijendra Singh
Rathore, R/o F31/a, Kaledas Marg, Bani Park, Jaipur
(Rajasthan)
3.
The Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur.
4.
S.h.o. Police Station Bani Park, Jaipur.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Suresh Sahni with
Mr. R.M. Sharma
Shikha Rathore, petitioner present in
person
Master Purab Singh Rathore, present
in person
For Respondent(s)
:
Ms. Rekha Madnani,
Additional Government Advocate
For Respondent No.2
:
Mr. Syed Shahid Hasan
Mr. Dileep Singh Rathore, respondent
No.2 present in person
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
Order
REPORTABLE
01/11/2019
1.
This matter was taken up in pre-lunch session when
minor child Purab Singh Rathore was not present in the Court but
his father respondent No.2 Dileep Singh Rathore was present, who
was directed to produce the minor child at 02.00 PM.
(2 of 6)
[HC-269/2019]
2.
Both appellant-mother Shikha Rathore and respondent-
father Dileep Singh Rathore are present in Court. Master Purab
Singh Rathore is also present in Court.
3.
This habeas corpus petition has been filed by Shikha
Rathore inter alia with the prayer that respondent No.3, the
Commissioner of Police, Jaipur Metropolitan, Jaipur and
respondent No.4, SHO, Police Station Bank Park, Jaipur be
directed to produce corpus, namely Purab Singh Rathore, aged 13
years before this Court and due and deserving justice may also be
imparted to her in terms of the law.
4.
As per the averments made in the habeas corpus
petition, the petitioner married the respondent No.2 on
22.03.2006 as per Hindu Customs and Rites. A male child was
born out of this wedlock, namely Purab Singh Rathore, on
27.05.2007. The petitioner alleged that ever since marriage she
was regularly teased and tortured by her husband not only post-
marriage but after the birth of child also for insufficient dowry. The
husband-respondent No.2 has no love and affection either for the
petitioner or for his minor son, who is presently studying in Class-
VII as resident student in Nimawat Public School, Fatehpur
Shekhawati, District Sikar. A photocopy of the mark-sheet of
Class-VI of the child has been annexed with the petition as
Annexure-2.
5.
It is further alleged that petitioner has suffered a lot at
the hands of respondent No.2 and when the torture and suffering
became unbearable, the petitioner was constrained to withdraw
from the company of the respondent No.2 on 05.07.2019 against
her wishes and since then she is residing at her parents house at
(3 of 6)
[HC-269/2019]
Jaipur. It is further stated that respondent No.2 was not extending
any kind of pecuniary or other support for the study of the minor
child and the petitioner anyhow was managing the entire expenses
by borrowing money from her parents and also pledging her
jewellery with the Muthoot Finance, Jaipur.
6.
Mr. Suresh Sahni, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner-wife submits that on the eve of Diwali festival, minor
child Purab Singh Rathore was having school holidays from
20.10.2019 to 09.11.2019. The petitioner by road went to the
school to pick up the minor child on 19.10.2019 and brought him
to Jaipur. Since then the child was staying with the petitioner at
her parental house. It is further submitted that on 22.10.2019
when the petitioner along with her minor son, her elder sister,
sister’s daughter and her father had gone to pay obeisance at the
temple Ghat-Ke-Balaji, situated at Galta Road,