HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
MANOJ KUMAR GARG
MOHAMMED SHAKIR QURESHI S/O SHRI CHUTTAN QURESHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB/17843/2022
BAIL - COMPROMISE - SECTION 439 CRPC - KEY LEGAL PROVISION
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested for offenses under Sections 376(2)(n), 384 IPC, and 66E of the IT Act. The petitioner and the complainant had reached a compromise, and the petitioner sought bail under Section 439 CrPC.
Finding of the Court:
The court noted that the challan had been presented and that the trial would take a long time to conclude. Considering the compromise and the totality of the circumstances, the court found it just and proper to grant bail to the petitioner.
Issues: Whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the compromise and the stage of the trial.
Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on Section 439 CrPC, which allows for bail when it is just and proper to do so. The court considered the compromise between the parties and the stage of the trial in reaching its decision.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail application and directed the petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17843/2022
Mohammed Shakir Qureshi S/o Shri Chuttan Qureshi, Aged
About 39 Years, Residence House No. 171, Darbar School Ke
Samne, Shahid Abdul Hameed Nagar, P.s. Thana-
Jhalupura,jaipur (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In
Central Jail Jaipur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. Mohd. Umar Farooq
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. Shyam Prakash Sharma, PP
Mr. Anwar Khan
Mr. Sameer
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Order
11/01/2023
The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR
No.240/2022 of Police Station Jalupura, District Jaipur City
(North), for the offence punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 384
IPC and Section 66E of IT Act (In order offence under Sections
376(2)(n), 384, 201 IPC and Section 66 of IT Act). He has
preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that challan of the case
has already been presented and compromise has also been
arrived at between the parties. The accused-petitioner is in judicial
custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be
concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the
accused-petitioner.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-17843/2022]
Learned counsel for the complainant concurs the fact of
compromise arrived at between the parties, however, learned
Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the
case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused
petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is
allowed and it is directed that petitioner Mohammed Shakir
Qureshi S/o Shri Chuttan Qureshi shall be released on bail in
connection with FIR No.240/2022 of Police Station Jalupura,
District Jaipur City (North) provided he executes a personal bond
in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of
Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his
appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing
and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J
MS /23
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.