SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
MST. KHATUNI D/O MALLE KHA W/O RAYAM KHA – Appellant
Versus
DEENA S/O MALLE KHA (DECEASED)(DECEASED) – Respondent
CW 24558/2018



Advocates:
['GAJENDER SINGH RATHORE', 'MOHD IQBAL KHAN', '', 'AKSHAY SHARMA', 'O P JHAJHRIA', 'KHIZER IQBAL KHAN']

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24558/2018

Mst. Khatuni D/o Malle Kha W/o Rayam Kha, R/o Pema, Tehsil

Punhana, District Gurgava, At Present Residing At Parehi (Since

Deceased) through LRs-

1/1. Noor Jahan D/o Mst.Khatuni W/o Arshad, R/o Hathin,

Palwal, Haryana.

1/2. Jakir S/o Mst.Khatuni W/o Kayam R/o Punhana, Mewat,

Haryana.

----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Deena S/o Malle Kha (Deceased), Through Legal

Representatives

1/1.

Smt. Mehtabi W/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama,

District Bhartpur, Rajasthan

1/2.

Haneef S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District

Bhartpur, Rajasthan

1/3.

Janmohammad S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama,

District Bhartpur, Rajasthan

1/4.

Iser S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District

Bhartpur, Rajasthan

1/5.

Mausam S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District

Bhartpur, Rajasthan

1/6.

Raheena D/o Deena W/o Khurshid, R/o Singar, Tehsil

Phunana, District Gurgava, Haryana

1/7.

Munni D/o Deena W/o Khalid, R/o Singar, Tehsil Phunana,

District Gurgava, Haryana

2.

Harun S/o Malle Kha, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District

Bharatpur, Rajasthan

3.

The State Of Rajasthan Through Tehsildar, Kama,

Bahratpur

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr.Gajender Singh Rathore, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr.Akshay Sharma, AGC

Mr.O.P.Jhajharia, Adv.

Mr.Khizer Iqbal Khan, Adv.

(2 of 2)

[CW-24558/2018]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR

Order

29/07/2022

Matter comes up on misc. application No.1/2022 filed under

Order 22 Rule 3 & 9 CPC for taking legal representatives of the

petitioner-Khatuni on record.

For the reasons mentioned in the aforesaid application, the

same is allowed. Amended cause-title is also taken on record.

Another application No.2/2022 filed under Section 5 of the

Limitation Act is also accordingly allowed.

Another application No.3/2022 has been filed by the

petitioner for withdrawal of the writ petition as parties have

entered into a compromise and terms of the compromise have

been filed as affidavit A-1 along-with the application.

Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the

said fact of compromise being entered into between the parties.

This Court accordingly dispose of the writ petition in view of

the compromise arrived at between the parties.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as

withdrawn.

(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J

Monika/Ashu/23

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top