HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
MST. KHATUNI D/O MALLE KHA W/O RAYAM KHA – Appellant
Versus
DEENA S/O MALLE KHA (DECEASED)(DECEASED) – Respondent
CW 24558/2018
['GAJENDER SINGH RATHORE', 'MOHD IQBAL KHAN', '', 'AKSHAY SHARMA', 'O P JHAJHRIA', 'KHIZER IQBAL KHAN']
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24558/2018
Mst. Khatuni D/o Malle Kha W/o Rayam Kha, R/o Pema, Tehsil
Punhana, District Gurgava, At Present Residing At Parehi (Since
Deceased) through LRs-
1/1. Noor Jahan D/o Mst.Khatuni W/o Arshad, R/o Hathin,
Palwal, Haryana.
1/2. Jakir S/o Mst.Khatuni W/o Kayam R/o Punhana, Mewat,
Haryana.
----Petitioner
Versus
1.
Deena S/o Malle Kha (Deceased), Through Legal
Representatives
1/1.
Smt. Mehtabi W/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama,
District Bhartpur, Rajasthan
1/2.
Haneef S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District
Bhartpur, Rajasthan
1/3.
Janmohammad S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama,
District Bhartpur, Rajasthan
1/4.
Iser S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District
Bhartpur, Rajasthan
1/5.
Mausam S/o Deena, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District
Bhartpur, Rajasthan
1/6.
Raheena D/o Deena W/o Khurshid, R/o Singar, Tehsil
Phunana, District Gurgava, Haryana
1/7.
Munni D/o Deena W/o Khalid, R/o Singar, Tehsil Phunana,
District Gurgava, Haryana
2.
Harun S/o Malle Kha, R/o Parehi, Tehsil Kama, District
Bharatpur, Rajasthan
3.
The State Of Rajasthan Through Tehsildar, Kama,
Bahratpur
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr.Gajender Singh Rathore, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr.Akshay Sharma, AGC
Mr.O.P.Jhajharia, Adv.
Mr.Khizer Iqbal Khan, Adv.
(2 of 2)
[CW-24558/2018]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR GAUR
Order
29/07/2022
Matter comes up on misc. application No.1/2022 filed under
Order 22 Rule 3 & 9 CPC for taking legal representatives of the
petitioner-Khatuni on record.
For the reasons mentioned in the aforesaid application, the
same is allowed. Amended cause-title is also taken on record.
Another application No.2/2022 filed under Section 5 of the
Limitation Act is also accordingly allowed.
Another application No.3/2022 has been filed by the
petitioner for withdrawal of the writ petition as parties have
entered into a compromise and terms of the compromise have
been filed as affidavit A-1 along-with the application.
Learned counsel for the respondents does not dispute the
said fact of compromise being entered into between the parties.
This Court accordingly dispose of the writ petition in view of
the compromise arrived at between the parties.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(ASHOK KUMAR GAUR),J
Monika/Ashu/23