SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SMT. SHALINI SHARMA W/O AVINASH SHARMA DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI UMA SHANKAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 7625/2019



HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN

BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7625/2019

1.

Smt. Shalini Sharma W/o Avinash Sharma Daughter Of

Late Shri Uma Shankar Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, By

Caste Brahamin , R/o. Infront Of New Court Canera Bank

Building Old Housing Board Colony Morena Madhya

Pradesh At Present R/o 23/137 Swarn Path Mansaraovar

Jaipur Metro Rajasthan

2.

Avinash Sharma S/o Shri Ganga Prasad Sharma, Aged

About 30 Years, By Cast Brahamin , R/o 28, Brijlal

Nagar , Mul Tonk, Malpura District Tonk Rajasthan At

Present R/o 23/137 Swarn Path Mansaraovar Jaipur Metro

Rajasthan

----Petitioners

Versus

1.

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.

2.

The Commissioner Of Police Jaipur Commissionerate

Jaipur, Raj.

3.

The Deputy Commissioner South Jaipur Commissionerate

Jaipur, Raj.

4.

The S.h.o Police Station Mansarover, Raj.

5.

The Superintendent Of Police (Madhya Pradesh Police)

District Morena, Madhya Pradesh.

6.

Shri Shubham Sharma S/o Shri Umashankar Sharma,

Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Brahamin , R/o. Infront Of

New Court Canera Bank Building Old Housing Board

Colony Morena Madhya Pradesh

7.

Chandra Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Late Shri Basudev

Prakash Sharma, Infront Of New Court Canera Bank

Building Old Housing Board Colony Morena Madhya

Pradesh

8.

Shri Niranjan Patsariya S/o Shriram Patsariya By Cast

Brahamin, R/o Village Birondha Maniya District Dholpur

Rajasthan

----Respondents

(2 of 2)

[CRLMP-7625/2019]

For Petitioner(s)

:

Mr. R.B. Sharma.

Mr. Amit Mittal.

For Respondent(s)

:

Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH

Order

06/12/2019

1.

This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure has been filed by petitioners Smt. Shalini Sharma & Sh.

Avinash Sharma for a direction to the respondent to provide police

protection.

2.

Petitioner no. 1 submitted that she is married to petitioner

no.2. Petitioner no.1 further submits that her parents are not

happy with her marriage with petitioner no.2 and her life is in

danger. Petitioners prayed for police protection.

3.

Learned Public Prosecutor submits that in case of any

wrongful act by the parents of either petitioner no.1 or petitioner

no.2, the police protection would be provided to them.

4.

In that view of the matter, in case of any difficulty,

petitioners are at liberty to approach the SHO, Police Station

Mansarover to provide safety and protection to their lives and the

concerned SHO is directed to ensure that no harm is caused to

them from those alleged persons.

5.

The present Criminal Misc. Petition is accordingly disposed of.

(INDERJEET SINGH),J

MG/21

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top