HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN - JAIPUR BEN
SMT. SHALINI SHARMA W/O AVINASH SHARMA DAUGHTER OF LATE SHRI UMA SHANKAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMP 7625/2019
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7625/2019
1.
Smt. Shalini Sharma W/o Avinash Sharma Daughter Of
Late Shri Uma Shankar Sharma, Aged About 28 Years, By
Caste Brahamin , R/o. Infront Of New Court Canera Bank
Building Old Housing Board Colony Morena Madhya
Pradesh At Present R/o 23/137 Swarn Path Mansaraovar
Jaipur Metro Rajasthan
2.
Avinash Sharma S/o Shri Ganga Prasad Sharma, Aged
About 30 Years, By Cast Brahamin , R/o 28, Brijlal
Nagar , Mul Tonk, Malpura District Tonk Rajasthan At
Present R/o 23/137 Swarn Path Mansaraovar Jaipur Metro
Rajasthan
----Petitioners
Versus
1.
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp.
2.
The Commissioner Of Police Jaipur Commissionerate
Jaipur, Raj.
3.
The Deputy Commissioner South Jaipur Commissionerate
Jaipur, Raj.
4.
The S.h.o Police Station Mansarover, Raj.
5.
The Superintendent Of Police (Madhya Pradesh Police)
District Morena, Madhya Pradesh.
6.
Shri Shubham Sharma S/o Shri Umashankar Sharma,
Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Brahamin , R/o. Infront Of
New Court Canera Bank Building Old Housing Board
Colony Morena Madhya Pradesh
7.
Chandra Prakash Sharma S/o Shri Late Shri Basudev
Prakash Sharma, Infront Of New Court Canera Bank
Building Old Housing Board Colony Morena Madhya
Pradesh
8.
Shri Niranjan Patsariya S/o Shriram Patsariya By Cast
Brahamin, R/o Village Birondha Maniya District Dholpur
Rajasthan
----Respondents
(2 of 2)
[CRLMP-7625/2019]
For Petitioner(s)
:
Mr. R.B. Sharma.
Mr. Amit Mittal.
For Respondent(s)
:
Mr. S.S. Ola, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Order
06/12/2019
1.
This petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal
Procedure has been filed by petitioners Smt. Shalini Sharma & Sh.
Avinash Sharma for a direction to the respondent to provide police
protection.
2.
Petitioner no. 1 submitted that she is married to petitioner
no.2. Petitioner no.1 further submits that her parents are not
happy with her marriage with petitioner no.2 and her life is in
danger. Petitioners prayed for police protection.
3.
Learned Public Prosecutor submits that in case of any
wrongful act by the parents of either petitioner no.1 or petitioner
no.2, the police protection would be provided to them.
4.
In that view of the matter, in case of any difficulty,
petitioners are at liberty to approach the SHO, Police Station
Mansarover to provide safety and protection to their lives and the
concerned SHO is directed to ensure that no harm is caused to
them from those alleged persons.
5.
The present Criminal Misc. Petition is accordingly disposed of.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
MG/21